Laserfiche WebLink
<br />9.2180,9.2470, <br />9.2686, 9.3220, <br />9.3822 <br />ci3J <br /> <br />9.2450(table) <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.2450(tahle) <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.2683(2) <br /> <br />(jj) <br /> <br />9.2685(1) <br /> <br />(fj) <br /> <br />9.2741 <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.2760 (table) <br />9.2761(6) <br /> <br />@> <br /> <br />"Average Lot Width" <br />requirement for Commercial, <br />Industrial, Public Land, <br />Downtown Westside & Royal <br />Node S ecial Area zones <br />Land Use Table for Industrial <br />Zones related to <br />Telecommunication towers and <br />facilities <br /> <br />Trucking Terminals allowed in <br />1-2 and 1.3 zones <br /> <br />PL zone requires a Site Review <br />for many uses and a CUP for <br />more significant uses within <br />300' of residential property <br /> <br />Height of buildings within 50' <br />of a residential zone restricted <br />to height limit of adjacent <br />residential zone <br /> <br />Land Use Table for Residential <br />Zones, related to rowhouses <br /> <br />Creation of duplex, triplex & <br />fourplex lots in new <br />subdivisions: Allows limited <br />number of multi-family lots in <br />R-l subdivisions <br /> <br />The tenn "Average lot width" is <br />mistakenly referenced. Lot <br />width is not measured by an <br />averaging approach (see 9.0500 <br />for definition oflot width). <br />Section 9.5750 specifically <br />allows telecommunication <br />towers in 1.1, but this is not <br />reflected on the Use Table (EC <br />9.2450 . <br />Since 1968 this use has been <br />permitted outright in these two <br />zones, however it is not <br />specifically listed in the 1-2 and <br />1.3 use tables. <br />Language is unclear. Could be <br />read to require a Site Review in <br />addition to a CUP. The intent <br />was to elevate more intense <br />uses to a more intense public <br />hearin rocess (i.e. Cup). <br />Language is not clear that the <br />special height restriction is <br />limited to that portion of a <br />building within the 50' huffer. <br />Does not account for buildings <br />with va in hei hts. <br />Rowhouses are allowed in <br />residential zones, subject to <br />specific limitations in some <br />zones. Table does not reference <br />the special limitations listed in <br />EC 9.735 Siting Re uirements <br />Code not clear this is limited to <br />subdivision plats, not partitions. <br />Also implies that a request to <br />utilize the allowance for a <br />duplex, triplex or fourplex in an <br />R-l subdivision is binding., <br />rather than an option, thereby <br />precluding future options to <br />simply build a single family <br />residence instead. <br /> <br />Eliminate the word "average" <br />from each code section. <br /> <br />Add the "S" symbol to the Land <br />Use Table enabling <br />telecommunication towers in <br />the I-I zone, subject to special <br />standards. <br />Clarify that trucking terminals <br />are permitted outright in the 1.2 <br />and 1-3 zones by listing in the <br />industrial use matrix. <br /> <br />Clarify language such that the <br />projects requiring a CUP are <br />not also subject to Site Review. <br /> <br />Clarify that the special height <br />restriction applies only for that <br />portion of a building within 50' <br />of a residential zone. <br /> <br />Include reference in the Land <br />Use Table regarding special <br />limitations listed in EC 9.735. <br /> <br />Modify language consistent <br />with duplex provisions in <br />9.2741(4,5,6). Also, clarify that <br />duplex, triplex, fourplex <br />designation entitles (rather than <br />mandates) owner to develop lot <br />with extra unit(s) <br /> <br />