Laserfiche WebLink
<br />9.6630(1 ) <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.6640(4)(d) <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.6650(3)(c) <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.6670(6)(b) <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.670~ <br /> <br />9.6730 <br />9.8030 <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.6745 (3)(b) <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.6745(3)(c) <br /> <br />@ <br /> <br />9.6805; 9.6870 <br /> <br />(mN(@) <br /> <br />Installation of Signs prior to <br />Permit Issuance <br /> <br />Vision Clearance Area for <br />Signs: <br /> <br />Signs for Manufactured Home <br />Park <br /> <br />Reference to Revocable Pertuit <br />Requirements for Signs in <br />ROW <br /> <br />Flood Plain Standards <br /> <br />On-site Pedestrian Circulation <br /> <br />Projecting Architectural <br />Features for Multiple Story <br />Buildings <br /> <br />Allowance for signs in required <br />front yard setbacks <br /> <br />Dedication of Public Ways <br /> <br />Language in code is not clear as <br />to when signs may be installed. <br />Some applicants have installed <br />signs before paying for their <br />oormit. <br />Reference to Vision Clearance <br />standards was not modified in <br />LUCU to match revised <br />language describing when <br />standards apply. <br />Code allows identity sign (e.g. <br />project name) for a subdivision <br />or Planned Unit Development <br />but not a manufactured home <br />park <br />Current code requires revocable <br />permit for all forms of signs in <br />the public right..of-way. Some <br />signs, such as plaques, or other <br />minor signs don't warrant <br />permit requirements <br />Current standards do not match <br />new federally mandated <br />language. <br />Code does not allow applicants <br />to request alternative <br />approaches to the requirements <br />regarding pedestrian <br />circulation. <br /> <br />Previous language was <br />inadvertently omitted which <br />allowed eaves, chimneys and <br />similar architectural features <br />above one story to project into <br />side yards (as is allowed for the <br />first story). Would allow a <br />chimney to encroach on first <br />floor but not the second floor. <br />Code section describing <br />allowed intrusions of signs into <br />setbacks does not match <br />allowance cited in residential <br />zones & sign standards. <br />References to public way <br />design standards do not ensure <br />consistency with public <br />improvement standards and <br />Arterial Collector Street Plan. <br /> <br />Clarify code to match current <br />policy that permit issuance, not <br />permit approval, must occur <br />before installing sign. <br /> <br />Clarify this reference by using <br />same applicability provisions as <br />main Vision Clearance Area <br />section (EC 9.6780). <br /> <br />Allow identity sign tor a <br />manufactured home park <br />consistent with other residential <br />developments. <br /> <br />Revise code to allow Public <br />Works staff the ability to waive <br />revocable permit process for <br />minor signs <br /> <br />Revisecocle to meet federal <br />standards. <br /> <br />Create an adjustment review <br />provision allowing <br />consideration of alternatives to <br />the current standards, provided <br />the alternative meets or exceeds <br />the same objectives as the <br />standards. <br />Modify language to clarify that <br />these architectural features are <br />allowed to project as per current <br />policy> which includes the <br />second story. <br /> <br />Revise code to be consistent in <br />all three locations which <br />currently allows signs to extend <br />up to 5' into 10' front yard <br />setback. <br />Provide necessary references in <br />Chapter 9 to ensure other <br />adopted design standards and <br />policies are applied. <br />