Laserfiche WebLink
<br />* 64 - 9.7110 - Planning director can approve with conditions. Will allow more <br />applications to be approved - implications unclear. <br /> <br />65 - 9.7605,9.7655 - Seems minor. (clarification of deadlines) <br /> <br />66 - 9.7805, 9.7885 - Industrial corridor map and description. Implications unclear. <br /> <br />67 - 9.8010 (table) - Friends of Eugene is opposed to trus change. If adopted dates for <br />applicable plans are not shown in the code, then it is very difficult for the public to <br />know when they are looking at the correct plan. Couldn't a pro-forma code <br />amendment be bundled with plan approval, to keep them synchronized without undue <br />expense? <br /> <br />68, 69 - 9.8030(1) - Timing and requirements for TOM plans. Do we want to make these <br />mushier? <br /> <br />70 - 9.8030(10) - Check for clarity and completeness after revision. <br /> <br />71 - 9.8055(1) - Cluster Subdivisions: relaxation of lot and development standards. <br />Check details. <br /> <br />72 - 9.8090(8)(c) - Street connectivity-related approval criteria. Implications unclear. <br /> <br />73 - 9.8310 - PUD design doesn't have be done by certified planner. What standard does <br />apply? <br /> <br />* 74 - 9.8335 - Allows modification of a tentative PUD approvaL Implications unclear. <br />75 - 9.8410(1) - Property Line Adjustment surveyors stamp. Minor <br />76 - 9.810(2) - Property Line Adjustment title report. Minor. <br /> <br />77 - 9.8580 - Final Subdivision Requirements modification procedure. Implications <br />unclear. <br /> <br />78 - 9.8710 - Vacations of improved right of way. Adding process. <br />79 - 9.8710(6) - ROW vacation consents. <br /> <br />80 - 9.8710(7) - Consent of public utility easement vacations. <br />81 - 9.8720 - Seems minor. <br /> <br />The stated findings in support of these code changes with regard to state planning goals <br />3 through 11 are so inadequate they are often simply solipsistic. Code changes are <br />minor, so there are no impacts. So where is a substantive analysis that each change is <br /> <br />Friend of Eugene · 10/31/05 · Page 6 <br />