My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 3: Action - Minor Land Use Code Amendments
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 11/28/05 Mtg
>
Item 3: Action - Minor Land Use Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:42:21 PM
Creation date
11/22/2005 1:22:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/28/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Reduced opportunities for public involvement in favor of Planning Director or <br /> <br />Staff discretionary approvals will lead to more public acrimony. (EC 9.7110) <br /> <br />The Mayor's SBI (Sustainability Business Initiative) on renewable energy will be <br /> <br /> <br />seen as a sham if solar setback changes that are proposed are approved. These <br /> <br /> <br />changes reduce the amount and opportunity of the potential renewable energy that <br /> <br />would be free to harvest. This act of approval run counter to prudent sustainability <br /> <br />goals. (EC 9.2795) <br /> <br />Minor code changes should not be used to assist a pending project such as the <br />Multi-Modal Freight Facility. (EC 9.2450) <br /> <br />Altering the definition of curved lots, without individual notices being sent to <br /> <br /> <br />property owners should not be allowed to happen. This would create corner lots <br /> <br /> <br />that most people would normally consider not to be a comer lot; thereby impacting <br /> <br /> <br />the owners ability to develop the property. This and all other changes in definitions <br /> <br /> <br />have a Measure 37 impact potential and should be removed from the list. I own <br /> <br /> <br />such a lot that is proposed for the change and if not for my watchful eyes and extra <br /> <br /> <br />ordinary community involvement, I would not have been aware that my property <br /> <br /> <br />was to be affected. I still do not fully lmow the ramifications of such a change; <br /> <br /> <br />maybe an explanation is in order? (EC 9.05000) <br /> <br />Modifications of a tentative PUD (Planned Unit Development) approval is already <br /> <br /> <br />too lax. There are already provisions in the code for multiple modifications to be <br /> <br /> <br />made concurrently. I have experienced this, as a Neighborhood President of Cal <br /> <br /> <br />Young Neighborhood Association during the proposed Crescent Village. As a <br /> <br /> <br />result of the multiple concurrent modifications approved, was a development that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.