Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit A to Administrative Order No. 44-23-01-F <br />City of Eugene Public Contracting Rules 2022 – Part 2 Page 100 <br /> <br />137-049-0390. Offer Evaluation and Award; Determination of Responsibility <br />1) General. If Awarded, the Contracting Agency shall Award the Contract to the Responsible <br />Bidder submitting the lowest, Responsive Bid or the Responsible Proposer or Proposers <br />submitting the best, Responsive Proposal or Proposals, provided that such Person is not <br />listed by the Construction Contractors Board as disqualified to hold a Public Improvement <br />Contract (ORS 279C.375(3)(a)) or is ineligible for Award as a nonresident (as defined in <br />ORS 279A.120) education service district (ORS 279C.325). The Contracting Agency may <br />Award by item, groups of items or the entire Offer provided such Award is consistent with <br />the Solicitation Document and in the public interest. Where Award is based on competitive <br />Bids, ORS 279C.375(5) permits multiple Contract awards when specified in the ITB. <br />2) Determination of Responsibility. Offerors are required to demonstrate their ability to perform <br />satisfactorily under a Contract. Before Awarding a Contract, the Contracting Agency must <br />have information that indicates that the Offeror meets the standards of responsibility set <br />forth in ORS 279C.375(3)(b). To be a Responsible Offeror, the Contracting Agency must <br />determine that the Offeror: <br />a) Has available the appropriate financial, material, equipment, facility and personnel <br />resources, and expertise, or ability to obtain the resources and expertise, necessary to <br />meet all contractual responsibilities; <br />b) Has completed previous contracts of a similar nature with a satisfactory record of <br />performance. A satisfactory record of performance means that, to the extent the costs <br />associated with and time available to perform a previous contract were within the <br />Offeror’s control, the Offeror stayed within the time and budget allotted for the <br />procurement and otherwise performed the contract in a satisfactory manner. A <br />Contracting Agency should carefully scrutinize an Offeror’s record of contract <br />performance if the Offeror is or recently has been materially deficient in contract <br />performance. In reviewing the Offeror’s performance, the Contracting Agency should <br />determine whether the Offeror’s deficient performance was expressly excused under the <br />terms of the contract, or whether the Offeror took appropriate corrective action. The <br />Contracting Agency may review the Offeror’s performance on both private and public <br />contracts in determining the Offeror's record of contract performance. The Contracting <br />Agency shall make its basis for determining an Offeror not Responsible under this <br />paragraph part of the Solicitation file; <br />c) Has a satisfactory record of integrity. An Offeror may lack integrity if a Contracting <br />Agency determines the Offeror demonstrates a lack of business ethics such as violation <br />of state environmental laws or false certifications made to a Contracting Agency. A <br />Contracting Agency may find an Offeror not Responsible based on the lack of integrity of <br />any Person having influence or control over the Offeror (such as a key employee of the <br />Offeror that has the authority to significantly influence the Offeror’s performance of the <br />Contract or a parent company, predecessor or successor Person). The standards for <br />Conduct Disqualification under Rule 137-049-0370 may be used to determine an <br />Offeror's integrity. A Contracting Agency may find an Offeror non-responsible based on <br />previous convictions of offenses related to obtaining or attempting to obtain a contract or <br />subcontract or in connection with the Offeror’s performance of a contract or subcontract. <br />The Contracting Agency shall make its basis for determining that an Offeror is not <br />Responsible under this paragraph part of the Solicitation file; <br />d) Is legally qualified to contract with the Contracting Agency; <br />e) In State Contracting Agency procurements, possesses an unexpired certificate, issued <br />by the Oregon Department of Administrative Services under 2015 Oregon Laws, chapter <br />454, section 2, if the Offeror employs 50 or more full-time workers at the time of the Bid <br />or Proposal Closing and the estimated Contract Price exceeds $500,000; and