Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit A to Administrative Order No. 44-23-01-F <br />City of Eugene Public Contracting Rules 2022 – Part 2 Page 104 <br /> <br />sheets, where available, and otherwise consisting of formal planning or budgetary <br />documents. <br />b) "Other Options" means those items generally considered appropriate for negotiation in <br />the RFP process, relating to the details of Contract performance as specified in OAR <br />137-049-0650, but excluding any material requirements previously announced in the <br />solicitation process that would likely affect the field of competition. <br />c) "Project" means a Public Improvement. <br />d) "Value Engineering" means the identification of alternative methods, materials, or <br />systems which provide for comparable function at reduced initial or life-time cost. It <br />includes proposed changes to the plans, Specifications, or other Contract requirements <br />which may be made, consistent with industry practice, under the original Contract by <br />mutual agreement in order to take advantage of potential cost savings without impairing <br />the essential functions or characteristics of the Public Improvement. Cost savings <br />include those resulting from life cycle costing, which may either increase or decrease <br />absolute costs over varying time periods. <br />3) Rejection of Bids. In determining whether all Responsive Bids from Responsible Bidders <br />exceed the Cost Estimate, only those Bids that have been formally rejected, or Bids from <br />Bidders who have been formally disqualified by the Contracting Agency, shall be excluded <br />from consideration. <br />4) Scope of Negotiations. Contracting Agencies shall not proceed with Contract Award if the <br />scope of the Project is significantly changed from the original Bid. The scope is considered <br />to have been significantly changed if the pool of competition would likely have been affected <br />by the change; that is, if other Bidders would have been expected by the Contracting <br />Agency to participate in the Bidding process had the change been made during the <br />solicitation process rather than during negotiation. This rule shall not be construed to <br />prohibit re-solicitation of trade subcontracts. <br />5) Discontinuing Negotiations. The Contracting Agency may discontinue negotiations at any <br />time, and shall do so if it appears to the Contracting Agency that the apparent low Bidder is <br />not negotiating in good faith or fails to share cost and pricing information upon request. <br />Failure to rebid any portion of the project, or to obtain subcontractor pricing information upon <br />request, shall be considered a lack of good faith. <br />6) Limitation. Negotiations may be undertaken only with the lowest Responsive, Responsible <br />Bidder pursuant to ORS 279C.340. That statute does not provide any additional authority to <br />further negotiate with Bidders next in line for Contract Award. <br />7) Public Records. To the extent that a Bidder's records used in Contract negotiations under <br />ORS 279C.340 are public records, they are exempt from disclosure until after the negotiated <br />Contract has been awarded or the negotiation process has been terminated, at which time <br />they are subject to disclosure pursuant to the provisions of the Oregon Public Records Law, <br />ORS 192.311 through 192.478. <br />Related State Statutes: ORS 279C.340 & 279A.065 <br /> <br /> <br />137-049-0440. Rejection of Offers <br />1) Rejection of an Offer. <br />a) A Contracting Agency may reject any Offer upon finding that to accept the Offer may <br />impair the integrity of the Procurement process or that rejecting the Offer is in the public <br />interest. <br />b) The Contracting Agency shall reject an Offer upon the Contracting Agency's finding that <br />the Offer: