Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit A to Administrative Order No. 44-23-01-F <br />City of Eugene Public Contracting Rules 2022 – Part 2 Page 51 <br /> <br />administrative remedies before seeking judicial review of the Contracting Agency’s qualified <br />products list decision. <br />2) Delivery. Unless otherwise stated in the Contracting Agency’s notice to prospective Offerors <br />of the opportunity to submit Goods for inclusion on the qualified products list, a prospective <br />Offeror must deliver a Written protest to the Contracting Agency within seven (7) Days after <br />issuance of the Contracting Agency’s decision to exclude the prospective Offeror’s Goods <br />from the qualified products list. <br />3) Content of Protest. The prospective Offeror’s protest shall be in Writing and must specify <br />the grounds upon which the protest is based. <br />4) Contracting Agency Response. The Contracting Agency shall not consider a prospective <br />Offeror’s qualified products list protest submitted after the timeline established for submitting <br />such protest under this rule, or such different time period as may be provided in the <br />Contracting Agency’s notice to prospective Offerors of the opportunity to submit Goods for <br />inclusion on the qualified products list. The Contracting Agency shall issue a Written <br />disposition of the protest in a timely manner. If the Contracting Agency upholds the protest, <br />it shall include the successful protestor’s Goods on the qualified products list. <br />5) Judicial Review. Judicial review of the Contracting Agency’s decision relating to a qualified <br />products list protest shall be in accordance with ORS 279B.420. <br /> <br />Related State Statutes: ORS 279A.065 & 279B.115 <br /> <br /> <br />137-047-0750. Judicial Review of Other Violations <br />Any violation of ORS chapter 279A or 279B by a Contracting Agency for which no judicial <br />remedy is otherwise provided in the Public Contracting Code is subject to judicial review as set <br />forth in 279B.420. <br />Related State Statutes: ORS 279A.065 & 279B.420 <br /> <br /> <br />137-047-0760. Review of Prequalification and Debarment Decisions <br />Review of the Contracting Agency’s prequalification and Debarment decisions shall be as set <br />forth in ORS 279B.425. <br />Related State Statutes: ORS 279B.425 <br /> <br /> <br />137-047-0800. Amendments to Contract Amendments and Price <br />Agreements <br /> Generally. A Contracting Agency may amend a Contract without additional competition in <br />any of the following circumstances: <br />a) The amendment is within the scope of the Procurement as described in the Solicitation <br />Documents, if any, or if no Solicitation Documents, as described in the sole source <br />notice or the approved Special Procurement, if any. An amendment is not within the <br />scope of the Procurement if the Agency determines that if it had described in the <br />Procurement the changes to be made by the amendment, it would likely have increased <br />competition or affected award of the Contract. <br />b) These Model Rules otherwise permit the Contracting Agency to Award a Contract <br />without competition for the goods or services to be procured under the Amendment. <br />c) The amendment is necessary to comply with a change in law that affects performance of <br />the Contract.