Item B: Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan

Home Browse Search

.1- \ . Riveridge Golf Course Chronological Summary Page 11 b. Received a caB from the Hearings Official at 11:00 a.m. indicating that Esther Lev.s comments concerning the wetland area Were available for pickup. Comments were quite limited: supported making wetlands "off- Umitstf to minimize human intrusion and urged replacement of vegetation Uarea impacted by bridge placement. The HearingS-Official also indiqated that he did not accept the city's explanation fot not requiring dedication of a bicycle path; decision concerning dedication would lringe on: (t) whether county was prepared . to accept the path and consequent liability; and/or (2) taking question. c. Received a call from Alan Clair at the Eugene Building Safety Division at approximately 11:15 a.m. as!cing if conditional use agreement for driving range had been executed yet. Advised hini that it had, noting it had been signed by Rio and Debbie on June 3rd and by S.usan Brody, Planning Director~ on June 28th. He said that building permit for driving range would be issued. {Note: under normal procedures, a copy of the agreement should have bee.n ~ent from Planning Department to Building Division as soon as it had been signed by the Planning. . Director.] d. Received copy ofODFW letter from the Hearings Official. OnFW gen:" . erally supportive; views this use as less damaging than alternative uses might be; considers impact minJmal; urges retention of vegetation to minimize human access into wetland areas. 25. July 27. 1988 a. Spoke with Jerry Kendall at 2:45 p.m. County staff had met but not reached a. decision; expected to have subsequent meeting later in the day.' . b. Received a call from the Hearings Official at 4:24. County staff was raising a new issue involving requirement for lOO-foot setback from ordinary high water line. 26. July 2St 1988 a. Obtained copy of latest county staff report .at 8:00 a.m. Staff basically held that app}icantnad not adequately addressed access requirements of Greenway and had not adequately addressed setback requirements. County memo, in part, appeared to hold that lOO-foot setback should be required as a means of preserving bicycle trail option. b. Hearings Official indicated that he would approve hoMing the record open to address setback issue. Requested that record be held open until noon on August 2, 1988.