My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 11/28/05 WS
>
Item B: Parks, Recreation and Open Space Comprehensive Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:15:08 PM
Creation date
11/22/2005 4:03:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/28/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
166
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Costs <br /> <br />Capital Costs <br /> <br />Table 3 provides cost estimates for the PROS facility Improvements <br />Identified in Table 1. These Include: capita! costs for all projects, <br />maintenance and operations costs for Priority One improvements, and <br />growth allocation percentages for purposes of calculating system <br />development charges (sdc's). <br /> <br />Developing new capital projects will have a significant impact on the <br />City's parks and open space maintenance budget and wilt also <br />require budgeting for capital preseNation and replacement costs In <br />'the longer term. It is Important that the City allocate sufficient <br />maintenance furidlng to protect maintain and eventually replace <br />new capital investments. In addition to the maintenance costs of new <br />projects, this plan recommends that a minimum per unit maintenance <br />budget be developed based on a detailed maintenance <br />management plan for each park type. This analysis will ftkely result in a <br />need for additional maintenance funding for existing porks for two <br />reasons. First for natural oreas, the rates could include fundfng to <br />improve habitat. Second, for areas that hove structures, the rates <br />could include the capitol replacement cost of the structures. <br /> <br />Growth allocation percentages allow the City to determine how <br />much of the Indlviduot prOject costs can be attributed to population <br />growth. These figures are used to calculate system development <br />charges. <br /> <br />Non-Capitol Costs <br /> <br />Table 4 provides cost estimates for non-capitol priority one programs <br />and projects identified in Table 2. <br /> <br />Costs estimates include the following categories: stafftng, matertals, <br />and other. A staffing FTE (full time equivafent) is indicated where <br />opproprlate. Of the costs listed, stafffng estimates are annual costs' <br />based on 0 yearly salary, plus benefits. Materials and other costs are <br />typically one time costs. All costs are in 2004 dollars and do not factor <br />In anticipated revenues. <br /> <br />CUy of Eugene PROS Project Lisf <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.