My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: Preparation for JEO Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 01/12/09 Work Session
>
Item B: Preparation for JEO Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:15:25 PM
Creation date
1/9/2009 9:27:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/12/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />estimated housing needs for 20 years. Staff will provide council with updates and opportunities for input <br />on HB 3337 over the next several months. <br /> <br />Role of the Metro Plan <br />The Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan Area Plan (Metro Plan) serves as the long-range comprehensive <br />plan and establishes the policy framework upon which Eugene, Springfield and Lane County make <br />coordinated land use decisions. The Metro Plan was originally jointly adopted by the three elected bodies <br />in 1972, and has undergone numerous updates, most recently in 2004. As such, each jurisdiction operates <br />under an identical policy framework. The Metro Plan sets forth general planning policies and serves as <br />the basis for coordinated development of various programs concerning growth, development and <br />conservation of resources within the metropolitan area. By jointly adopting the Metro Plan, the three <br />metropolitan area partners recognize the interrelatedness of each others’ growth and transportation <br />decisions. The Metro Plan boundaries include all land within the Eugene-Springfield urban growth <br />boundary (UGB), as well as some additional land situated outside, but adjacent to the UGB (see attached <br />Metro Plan Diagram). <br /> <br />Topic 1: Provision of Urban Services <br />The Metro Plan delineates through its policies how services are to be provided within the Metro Plan <br />boundaries. These policies, which focus on land use and development issues, were adopted to ensure <br />efficient delivery of basic services, avoid duplication of government services, and to discourage <br />urbanization outside of the two cities’ UGBs. Briefly summarized, the Metro Plan’s policies create the <br />following framework for managing growth: <br />? <br /> <br />That compact urban growth occur inside the city limits; <br />? <br /> <br />Cities are the logical providers of urban services needed to accommodate urban levels of <br />development within the UGB; <br />? <br /> <br />A city should not annex property if that city can not provide a minimum level of key urban <br />services to that property; <br />? <br /> <br />Existing special districts are an interim method of providing key urban services and will <br />eventually be dissolved inside the UGB. <br /> <br />The term “key urban facilities and services” as defined in the Metro Plan refers to the following <br />“minimum level” services that support urban development: wastewater service, stormwater service, <br />transportation, solid waste management, water service, fire and emergency medical services, police <br />protection, citywide parks and recreation programs, electric service, land use controls, communication <br />facilities, and public schools on a district-wide basis. The “full range” of key urban facilities and services <br />also includes urban public transit, natural gas, street lighting, libraries, local parks, local recreation <br />facilities and services, and health services. The Plan recognizes that “a variety of public services are <br />provided by Lane County and special service districts to unincorporated portions of the Eugene- <br />Springfield metropolitan area.” (Growth Management Finding No. 10) <br /> <br />The staff memorandum from Lane County suggests that the Metro Plan’s lack of an explicit description of <br />services provided by Lane County is potentially detrimental to future funding options such as the creation <br />of a special taxing district to support the County’s provision of services. <br /> <br />In the past, the City Council has broadly indicated support for creating new mechanisms to help pay for <br />basic urban services and geographic-specific Metro Plan policy amendments to permit another jurisdiction <br />to create a localized special district. Previous City Councils have not supported amendments that would <br /> Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090112\S090112B.DOC <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.