Laserfiche WebLink
REPORT ON COMPLIANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS <br />APPLICABLE TO EACH MAJOR PROGRAM AND ON INTERNAL CONTROL <br />OVER COMPLIANCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH OMB CIRCULAR A-133 <br />To the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council <br />City of Eugene, Oregon <br />Compliance <br />We have audited the compliance of the City of Eugene with the types of compliance requirements <br />described in the U.S. Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-133 Compliance <br />Supplement that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, <br />2008. The City’s major federal programs are identified in the summary of auditors' results section <br />of the accompanying schedule of findings and questioned costs. Compliance with the <br />requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants applicable to each of its major federal <br />programs is the responsibility of the City’s management. Our responsibility is to express an <br />opinion on the City’s compliance based on our audit. <br />We conducted our audit of compliance in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted <br />in the United States of America; the standards applicable to financial audits contained in <br />Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States; and <br />OMB Circular A-133, Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations. Those <br />standards and OMB Circular A-133 require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain <br />reasonable assurance about whether noncompliance with the types of compliance requirements <br />referred to above that could have a direct and material effect on a major federal program <br />occurred. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence about the City’s compliance <br />with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in <br />the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our <br />audit does not provide a legal determination of the City's compliance with those requirements. <br />In our opinion, the City complied, in all material respects, with the requirements referred to above <br />that are applicable to each of its major federal programs for the year ended June 30, 2008. <br />Internal Control Over Compliance <br />The management of the City is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal <br />control over compliance with the requirements of laws, regulations, contracts, and grants <br />applicable to federal programs. In planning and performing our audit, we considered the City’s <br />internal control over compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on <br />a major federal program in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of <br />expressing our opinion on compliance, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the <br />effectiveness of internal control over compliance. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on <br />the effectiveness of the City's internal control over compliance. <br />A control deficiency in entity’s internal control over compliance exists when the design or <br />operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of <br />performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect noncompliance with a type of <br />compliance requirement of a federal program on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a <br />control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the entity’s ability <br />to administer a federal program such that there is more than a remote likelihood that <br />noncompliance with a type of compliance requirement of a federal program that is more than <br />inconsequential will not be prevented or detected by the entity’s internal control. <br />