Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The key pages of the CAFR which you may wish to review are pages 13-14 and pages 157-158, where <br />two of the auditors' reports are found. In the first report, the auditors have issued an unqualified opinion <br />(also known as a "clean opinion") on the City's basic financial statements, indicating that the City has <br />prepared these statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). GAAP <br />for state and local governments is promulgated by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board <br />(GASB) to ensure consistency in accounting and comparability in financial reporting among state and <br />local governments. A clean opinion is a fundamental financial goal for every government, as it <br />represents the highest level of opinion a government can receive from its independent auditors. A clean <br />opinion is an important indicator of sound financial management and creditworthiness to the citizens, <br />other governmental jurisdictions (state and federal), credit rating agencies, investment bankers, bond <br />holders, and other private sector entities. <br /> <br />In the second report, the auditors address the City’s compliance with applicable provisions of Oregon <br />Revised Statutes, including requirements related to debt, deposit of public funds, preparation and <br />adoption of the budget, accounting records and related internal control structure, etc. In addition, the <br />auditors also report if the City had any significant internal control weaknesses. The auditors noted that <br />the City complied with all laws with one exception. The General Obligation Debt Service Fund <br />overspent its debt service payment authority by $35,398, or 0.6%. Staff underestimated the debt service <br />payment by this amount. <br /> <br />ORS require that all over-expenditures be brought to the attention of the governing body. Because there <br />is no dollar threshold, it is common for local governments to have occasional over-expenditures. As a <br />benchmark for reference, in the past decade with total annual budgets of between $400-500 million, the <br />City has been cited for seven other over-expenditures totaling $158,797. This indicates that over- <br />expenditures rarely occur. <br /> <br />Two additional reports, beginning on page 161, specifically address compliance with Federal laws, <br />regulations, contracts and grants, and indicate that the auditors found no material instances of the City's <br />noncompliance with these requirements, nor were there any findings or questioned costs noted in <br />relation to Federal awards made to the City. <br /> <br />Starting with fiscal year 2008 audits, there are new professional requirements mandating auditors to <br />provide a report to the governing body that addresses any concerns or findings they encountered in such <br />audit-related issues as significant audit findings, accounting estimates and disagreements with <br />management. Isler CPA’s memo addressing these issues is attached and it states that there were no <br />concerns that required communication to you. <br /> <br />The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a <br />Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City of Eugene for its <br />Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2007. This was the <br />32nd consecutive year that the City achieved this prestigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate <br />of Achievement, a government must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized CAFR, which <br />satisfies both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. In addition, <br />the requirements for the certificate provide much of the information needed for the City’s credit <br />assessments. <br /> <br /> Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090112\S0901123C.doc <br /> <br />