Laserfiche WebLink
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT <br />To the Honorable Mayor, Members of the Urban <br />Renewal Agency Board and the Administrator of the <br />Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Eugene, Oregon <br />We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activities and each <br />major fund of the Urban Renewal Agency of the City of Eugene, Oregon (“Agency”) (a component <br />unit of the City of Eugene, Oregon) as of and for the year ended June 30, 2008, which collectively <br />comprise the Agency’s basic financial statements, as listed in the table of contents. These <br />financial statements are the responsibility of the Agency’s management. Our responsibility is to <br />express opinions on these financial statements based on our audit. <br />We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United <br />States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain <br />reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. <br />An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in <br />the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and <br />significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement <br />presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. <br />In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, <br />the respective financial position of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Agency <br />as of June 30, 2008, and the respective changes in financial position for the year then ended in <br />conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. <br />The management’s discussion and analysis and budgetary comparison information on pages 5 <br />through 9 and 31 through 32, are not a required part of the basic financial statements but are <br />supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United <br />States of America. We have applied certain limited procedures to the management’s discussion <br />and analysis on pages 5 through 9, which consisted principally of inquiries of management <br />regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the supplementary information. <br />However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it. The schedules of <br />revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balance - budget and actual, on pages 31 and 32 <br />have been subject to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements <br />and, in our opinion, are fairly stated in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. <br />Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that <br />collectively comprise the Agency’s basic financial statements. The other supplementary <br />information is presented for purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic <br />financial statements. That information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in <br />the audit of the basic financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated, in all material <br />respects, in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. <br />Isler CPA <br />By: <br />Paul Nielson, CPA, a member of the firm <br />Eugene, Oregon. <br />November 14, 2008. <br /> <br />