Laserfiche WebLink
The amendment will not reduce Eugene's inventory of commercial buildable lands, because the <br />portion of the property designated Commercial was not included in the Eugene Commercial <br />Lands Study inventory. The Commercial Lands Study methodology for computing the <br />commercial buildable Iand inventory included "any tax lot or portion of a tax lot that was vacant <br />and zoned or designated for commercial use..." [Eugene Commercial Land Study, page II~1]. <br />Subsequent field checking evaluated parcels larger than .5 acre in size for their availability for <br />development. At the time the inventory was assembled, staff determined that the site was not <br />considered to be "vacant" commercial land because it was part of the Lane County juvenile <br />justice campus; therefore, it was not included in the site inventory [Analysis of the Quality of <br />Commercial Lands, January 1990, willakenzie subarea map, southern portion, Attachment 3]. <br />Even without the western portion of the Skipworth property included, the supply of vacant <br />commercial land within the Eugene Urban Growth Boundary totaled 505 acres, as of January <br />1989. VL~ith the addition of redevelopment of existing developed sites in the downtown area and <br />of surface parking lots owned by the Eugene Renewal Agency, of neighborhood commercial <br />development in areas designated Residential, and of limited commercial development allowed on <br />sites designated Industrial, the study concluded that the supply of commercial land exceeded the <br />2010 projected demand for commercial land by over 100 acres [Commercial Land Study, Table <br />4, Supply of and Demand for Commercial Land, page II-15, Attachment 4], Since the Skipworth <br />property was not included in the commercial land supply, amending the Metro Plan diagram hand <br />concurrent automatic amendment to the willakenzie Area Plan diagram} will not affect Metro <br />Plan compliance with Goal 9. <br />No Metro Plan diagram amendments or rezonings were adopted concurrent with the adoption of <br />the Commercial Lands Study; rather, it was anticipated that property owners would determine the <br />timing of amendments. Lane County's request to amend the Metro Plan diagram hand <br />automatically the Willakenzie Area Plan diagrams} for the Skipworth property is consistent with <br />this approach. <br />The amendment will not affect the supply of commercial lands, as documented in the Eugene <br />Commercial Lands Study, and will not otherwise affect Metro Plan compliance with Goal 9. <br />Goal la, Housing: ~'o provide for the housing needs of citizens of the state. <br />As j uvenile detention facilities are not considered a residential use and no residentially zoned or <br />designated land is involved in this application, this Goal is not relevant and the amendment will <br />not affect Metro Plan compliance with Goal 10. <br />Goal 11, Public Facilities and Services: ~'o plan and develop a timely, orderly and efficient <br />arrangement of publ is facil staes and services to serve as a framework for urban and rural <br />development <br />The property currently has the full complement of urban services and facilities, Because no <br />transition from rural to urban development is required, and no extension or addition of public <br />facilities and services is needed as a result of the amendment, this Goal is not relevant and the <br />4 <br />