Ordinance No. 20089 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Goals 16 through 19 Estuarine Resources, Coastal Shorelands, Beaches and Dunes, and (]cean Resources}: There are no coastal, ocean, estuarine, or beach and dune resources related to the property or involved in the amendment, Therefore, these Goals are not relevant and the amendment will not affect Metro Plan compliance with Goals 16 through 19, Metro Plan Amendment Criteria #Z; EC 9.128 3 b Ado tion of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internall inconsistent. The Metro Plan diagram amendment will not create any internal inconsistencies inthe Metro Plan. Rather, the amendment will correct the difference between the property's zoning and the Metro Plan diagram. The amendment will also have the Q Street Channel serve as the more logical break between the Commercial and the Government and Education Metro Plan diagram designations. South of the Q Street Channel, the property currently has two Metro Plan designations, despite the fact that the property is a single tax lot with a single owner, Lane County. The entire property is zoned PL, Public Land. There are no text references in the Metro Plan to the land use designation for this property. For nearly 4o years the Skipworth juvenile detention facility has been located on the property. The juvenile justice uses in conjunction with Skipworth are consistent with the underlying Public Land zoning district. "Community resource centers owned by public agencies" [EC Section 9.402~b}] and "Public buildings and uses" SEC Section 9,402~c}] are permitted uses in the PL Public Land District, and the property will continue in government ownership and use. The property's overall PL zoning district and its split Plan designations creates a difference between the zoning map and the Metro Plan diagram. This can be resolved through approval of the amendment to redesignate the western portion of the property, south of the Q Street Channel, from Commercial to Government and Education on the Metro Plan diagram. As cited under EC 9.1253}~a} above, the amendment requested is consistent with adopted functional refinements to the Metro Plan, including TransPlan X1986}, the Eugene Commercial Lands Study X1992}, and the Eugene Parks and Recreation Plan X1989}. Since the amendment is consistent with adopted functional ref nements to the Metro Plan and there are no text references to the Skipworth property in the Metro Plan, the amendment will not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. 6