Ordinance No. 20099 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Because a wide range of potential uses are allowed in the I-1 zone, a com orison of ener p gy consumption or conservation between particular industrial and commercial uses is neither practical or appropriate. Far example, an industrial warehouse could have extremel different . Y energy consumption rates as opposed to a manufacturing plant, However, future development plans will be subject to applicable energy efficiency requirements established in the Eu ene g bulld~ng code and state and federal standards. Therefore, the amendment will not affect Metro Plan compliance with statewide lannin Goal p g 13. Goal 14-Urbanization: To provide for an orderly and efficient transition om rural to urban land use. The subject site is within the Eugene city limits and Urban Growth Bound and has all ~' necessary urban services. The property is not being converted from rural to urban land use. Therefore, this Goal is not relevant and the amendment will not affect Metro Plan com liance . p with statewide planning Goal 14. Goal 15-Willamette River Greenway: To protect, conserve, enhance and maintain the natural scenic, historical, agricultural, economic and recreational qualities of lands alon the . g Willamette Diver as the Willamette River Greenway. The subject site is not within the ~L~Uillamette River Greenway, therefore this Goal is not relevant and the amendment will not affect Metro Plan compliance with statewide tannin Goal 15. p g Goals 16 through 19-Estuarine Resources, Coastal Shorelands, Beaches and Dunes and Gcean Resources There are no coastal, ocean, estuarine, or beach and dune resources related to the site or involved in the amendment. Therefore, these Goals are not relevant and the amendment will not affect Metro Plan compliance with Goals 16 through 19. Metro Plan Amendment Criterion #2: EC 9.128 3 b Ado Lion of the amendment must not make the Metro Plan internall ~ncons~stent. The Metro Plan amendment will not alter the Metro Plan's internal consistent because the Y amendment only modif es the Plan Diagram. No modification to the Metro Plan text references are necessary. As cited under EC 9.128(3}(a} above, the amendment is consistent with adapted policies contained in the Metro Plan, the Willow Creek Special Area Study (1982 ,and ~ a • applicable functional plans including TransPlan (1986}, the Eugene Commercial Lands Stud . Y (1992} and the Metropolitan rndustr~al Lands Special Study (1993}, ~o