Laserfiche WebLink
administration of the state's wetland regulatory system. These changes, approved after <br />adoption of the Plan in 1992, included provisions for allowing "utilities and <br />transportation facilities not built, but specifically identified in the acknowledged local <br />comprehensive plan "within otherwise protected areas SCAR 141, Division 86}. The <br />amendments listed above, made possible by the changes to OAR, ensure consistency <br />between the Plan designation and policy contained in TransPlan, a refinement plan to the <br />Metro Plan, <br />Conclusions: The amendments address planned transportation projects to respond to changes in <br />state regulations and thus are consistent with the criterion in Eugene Code <br />9.1452}~c}(4}. <br />Summary Conclusions: <br />Each of the proposed amendments meet the criteria under Eugene Code sections 9.145(2)(a) and <br />(2)(b) and one or more of the criteria for approval of a refinement plan amendment as set forth in <br />Eugene Code section 9.145(2)(c). <br />Based upon the discussion, findings and conclusions herein above} the Eugene City <br />Council finds the proposed amendments to be consistent with the criteria contained in <br />Eugene Code section 9.145. <br />Ordinance, Exhibit C (,Metro Plan and WEWP P'indings~ page ~ <br />