My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20151
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 20151
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:49:24 PM
Creation date
1/14/2009 2:18:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20151
Document_Title
Levying assessments for paving, curbs, gutters, street lights, pedestrial signal, street trees, force main, & storm drainage systems on Barger Dr. from Terry St. to Greenhill Rd.; paving, curbs, gutters, street lights, trees, wastewater .....
Adopted_Date
3/15/1999
Approved Date
3/15/1999
CMO_Effective_Date
3/15/1999
Signer
James D. Torrey
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t <br />A~. 1 <br />k <br />March 1, 1999 <br />Administrative Services <br />City of Eugene <br />8fiD ~ . Park , #~3Da <br />PC box 19fi7 <br />Eugene , or 97~'~D <br />RE: Barger Drive Improvements: <br />A group of us came to the first hearing RE:Barger Dr., but <br />we gat nowhere and felt it was a waste of time. <br />It s®em3s that everything had been decided ahead of time, so <br />why have hearings? <br />Therefor®, I've decided to writ® instead of att®nding the <br />scheduled March I.S, 1999 hearing, knowing that what is said <br />would gv in one ear and out the other. <br />Since this fs a fenced and gated community of manufactured <br />homes, the assessment should have gene to Sumrnerfield <br />Estates and not to a eel®ct few who happen to five closer to <br />Barger Dr.. Dur address is not Barg®r. <br />you assess®d same of Barger, a piece an each end of the <br />eight residental pieces, to 5ummerfield, sa why nat all of <br />it? It makes no sense whatever, <br />Haw unfair can it be to haue to pay far something that one <br />can't see, use or have. access ta? There's no benefit tv us ~~~ <br />what®ver. Abetter way of assessing should be found. <br />If you've read this far--~--Thanks! <br />Sincer®ly <br />~ ti '"r <br />r~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.