Ordinance No. 20152 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

and sidewalk improvements similar to other properties that are adjacent to the improvements. Approximately 30.28-feet of the Champignon property~is adjacent to the improvement see attached map}. A driveway access rota the development is~ immediately south of the limits of the improvements. The code does not limit a properties assessable property length based on location of driveways or constraints that may exist. Staff ~s proposing to only assess the actual property length directly adj acent to the improvement which is less than the minimum GO-feet def ned in 7.175.b. ~ ~ }. In the future, when Hammock Street is ultimately improved, the balance of Champignon will be assessed. PRUJECT DESCRIPTIaN The project included construction of 1,000 feet of 21-foot paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks and storm sewers. Sidewalks were constructed on south side of the street only. ASSESSMENT Costs are distributed per City Code 7.175, and as outlined in the :Council adopted hearings official minutes, f ndings and recommendations and resolution forming the L1D. Under City of Eu ene g assessment policy,100 percent of the assessable improvement costs will be distributed to the abutting property owners with the balance f nanced by the City. Below are the f nal unit assessable costs. 21' Paving $66.721front foot Sidewalk $10.151front foot Cost to City: $133,497.13 flow income subsidy, storm sewer, and street trees} Costs listed below are the estimated assessment costs calculated from the low bid: 21' Paving $ 71.771fror~t foot Sidewalk $ 15.301front foot Cost to City: $$7,970 RECUMMENDATIaN The f naI improvement costs are lower than those quoted at the local improvement hearing and are comparable to projects of similar size. 1f the hearings official concludes that Champignon should not be assessed due to the unique nature of the lot configurations, staff recommends that the City bear the assessable costs per section 7.1751}fie}. Staff recommends approval of the assessment as calculated and that the Council levy the final assessment. Page 2