Laserfiche WebLink
ASSESSMENT <br />Costs are distributed per City Code 7.175, and as outlined in the Council adopted hearings official <br />minutes, findings and recommendations and resolution forming the LID. Under City of Eugene <br />assessment policy,100 percent of the assessable improvement costs will be distributed to the abutting <br />property owners with the balance financed by the City. Below are the final assessable unit costs. <br />21' Paving $6b.721front foot <br />Sidewalk $10.15 lfront foot <br />Cost to City: $133,497.13 flow income subsidy, storm sewer, and street trees} <br />Costs listed below are the estimated assessment costs calculated from the low bid: <br />21' Paving $ 71.771front foot <br />Sidewalk $ 15.301front foot <br />Cost to City: $87,970 <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />The City Engineer has provided the Hearings Official with a memorandum which outlined the above <br />information and which recommended approval of the assessment as calculated. A public hearing <br />regarding the proposed distx~ct formation was held on February 23,1999. The minutes of this hearing <br />are attached to these Findings and Recommendations as Exhibit "A."Three members of the public, <br />appeared at this hearing. Mr. Jeff Davis, president of the homeowners association for Champignon, <br />testified that the association Board of Directors did not believe that the Champignon development <br />sufficiently benefited from the improvement to justify an assessment. He noted that his Board felt it <br />was more reasonable for the City to assess the homeowners association at the time that Hammock <br />Street was improved. Ms. Norma Ritzman and Xenia McBride testified in opposition to the <br />assessment. <br />The Hearings Official finds the proposed assessment, as it relates to the Champignon Homeowners <br />Association, to be reasonable for the following reasons. First, while only 30+ lineal feet of the <br />Champignon property is adjacent to the improvement, several residents of the development likely use <br />Brickley Road and would benefit from the improvement. Second, the assessment to the homeowners <br />association is limited to the actual length of property contiguous to the improvement and not the full <br />minimum of 60 feet as defined by Eugene Code 7.175.b.(1 }. The balance of the developmeht would <br />be assessed with a Hammock Street local improvement district. Finally, the timing of future <br />improvements to Hammock Street is uncertain and it is likely that the Brickley Road improvement <br />project will benefit the Champignon Homeowners Association for many years prior to the approval of <br />an improvement project on Hammock Street. <br />The Hearings Official finds that the final improvement costs are lower than those quoted at the local <br />improvement hearing and are comparable to other projects of similar size and nature. The Hearings <br />Official further finds that the proposed assessments are calculated in accordance with the Eugene Code <br />and that the project is one for which the assessments are for a local improvement as set forth in ORS <br />310.140 because: <br />~ 1 } The assessments do not exceed actual costs; <br />~2} The assessments are imposed for a Capital Improvement Construction Project which provides <br />a specific benefit to a specific property or rectifies the problem caused by a specific property; <br />Findings and Recommendations far Final Assessment -Job 3549 Wage 2 <br />