Ordinance No. 20162 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

GRDINANCE NO. 20162 AN ORDINANCE DENYING AN AMENDMENT T4 THE EUGENE- SPRINGFIELD METROPOLITAN AREA GENERAL PLAN DIAGRAM AND THE WILLAKENZIE AREA PLAN DIAGRAM TO REDESIGNATE PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS A PORTION OF TAX LOT 3500, MAP 17-03- 29-11, FROM MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO COMMERCIAL; DENYING AN AMENDMENT TO THE TEXT OF THE WILLAKENZIE AREA PLAN OAKWAY SUBAREA POLICY #2 TO ALLOW ADDITIONAL COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT; AND DENYING THE REZONING OF A PORTION OF TAX LOT 3500 FROM R-1 LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO C-2lSR GENERAL COMMERCIAL WITH SITE REVIEW SUBDISTRICT JAMES FAMILY TRUST}. The City Council of the City of Eugene finds that: A. 0n May 13,1998, James Family Trust ~"the applicant"} submitted an application for a Type ZI Metro Plan amendment, concurrent amendment to the willakenzie Area Plan refinement plan}, and concurrent zone change to redesignate and rezone 0.7 acres of tax lot 3500, Map 17-03- 29-11, from medium-density residential to commercial, and redesignate and rezone the remainder of tax lot 3540 and tax lots 2000, 4000, 4100 and 4200, Map 17-03-29-11 X1.9 acres}, from medium- density residential to low-density residential. ~n January 19, 1999, the applicant submitted a required transportation analysis and a zone change request, which were determined to be complete on January 26,1999. The re~.nement plan text amendment was proposed to revise Policy #2 of the Willal~enzie Area Plan Gakway Subarea to allow for this increase in commercial designations. B. This proposal came to the City of Eugene for action pursuant to procedures for amendment and refinement of the Metro Plan described in the Metro Plan and Chapter 9 of the Eugene Code, 1971 SEC}, which establishes the Eugene City Council as the approval body for Type ~Z Metro Plan diagram amendments located within the incorporated city limits of Eugene. Since a text amendment to the refinement plan is required for consistency with the proposed Metro Plan diagram amendment, a concurrent refinement plan amendment application was submitted by the applicant per EC 9.1364}. C. 0n February 2,1999, the Metro Plan amendment application was referred to Lane County and the City of Springfield, and referral notice of the application and public hearing information was mailed to the Harlow Neighbors and Cal Young Neighborhood Group. D. ~n February 17,1999, notice of the hearing was mailed to the owner of the property subject to the amendment, and to owners and occupants of property within 300 feet of the subject property. Guard. E. On February 16,1999, notice of the hearing was published in the Eugene Register- Grdinance -1