Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Cahill described the project. The project included the construction of a street and street <br />paving, as well as the construction of sidewalks, street lights and, for some of the properties, a <br />wastewater and stormwater pipe. Ms. Cahill indicated that the final step of the project, the <br />installation of street trees, would be completed this winter. <br />Ms. Cahill completed her description of the project and the proposed assessment by <br />describing the proposed assessment. The assessment for the street construction is proposed to be <br />$50.70 for each front foot of property along Avalon Street. The City is proposing to assess $14.51 <br />for each front foot for sidewalk construction. The City is also proposing to assess one property a <br />lump sum of $21,085.75 for construction of a waste water and storm water pipe. Ms. Cahill <br />pointed out that, with the exception of the lump sum assessment, the actual proposed assessments <br />were less than the estimated assessments provided at the time of the formation of the local <br />improvement district. Ms. Cahill concluded by passing on the City Engineer's recommendation <br />that the assessments be approved as calculated. <br />Four members of the public, representing two families, were present to testify at the <br />hearing. The first member of the public to speak was Mr. Jackie Sprague, owner of property with <br />an address of 1417 Adelman Loop. Mr. Sprague indicated that his family had purchased the <br />property in July 1998. Mr. Sprague indicated that his family had not received any notification of <br />the local improvement district or the impending assessment until they received the letter about the <br />proposed final assessment. Mr. Sprague asked if the properties on the north side of Avalon Street <br />were to be assessed for the improvement of Avalon Street. <br />Ms. Cahill responded that the property on the north side of Avalon Street was included in <br />the proposed improvement district, and would be assessed along with other properties. Ms. Cahill <br />also indicated that the Spragues had purchased their property just after the local improvement <br />district had been formed. Ms. Cahill indicated that the City had sent notice to the property owner <br />of record at the time the local improvement district was formed, which was what was required by <br />the Eugene Code, and was the only information that the City had available. <br />Ms. Cahill also reminded the Spragues that in this instance the developer of their property <br />had promised to pay $4,500 for each of the properties in the development, including the Spragues' <br />property. Ms. Cahill indicated that the developer had indicated that he would pay the City the day <br />after the City levied the assessment. The hearings officer inquired about how the City expected to <br />deal with this promised payment. Ms. Cahill indicated that, if Mr. Picullel made the payment as <br />promised, the Engineering Division would work with the City Finance Department to make certain <br />that each of the property owners would be credited the amount of the payment. <br />Mr. Sprague asked about the area between their property and the street. Mr. Sprague <br />indicated that this area was steeply sloped and was isolated from their property by a fence. Ms. <br />Cahill indicated that the City recognized that more work was needed to finish this portion of the <br />project. The City was working with the contractor to place more soil in this area, and seed the <br />area. Ms. Cahill also indicated that it was City policy that, once the project was completed, it <br />would be the abutting property owner's responsibility to maintain the area between their property <br />Minutes -November 17,1999 Public Hearing Page 2 <br />