My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item B: River Avenue Improvements
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2005
>
CC Agenda - 12/12/05 WS
>
Item B: River Avenue Improvements
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:16:04 PM
Creation date
12/7/2005 10:36:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/12/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
83
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />R. <br /> <br />A <br /> <br />T <br /> <br />o <br /> <br />he <br /> <br />Iver venue ransportatlon utreac omments <br /> would be a biQ help. <br />234 July 11 RRAR Charging 50% of cost to property owners seems arbitrary. Is there a way of <br /> assessing the costs on a more equitable formula based on regional use vs. local <br /> neiohborhood use. <br />235 July 11 RRAR Street trees with road repair monies??? Do basic street repair overlay until ODOT <br /> decision. Defer proiect until ODOT decision. <br />236 July 11 RRAR This is a business area supporting small business with own off street parking. <br /> Curbs and water drains and overlay needed. Street may be blocked in future. Only <br /> simple maintenance should be done tm ODOT makes decision on Beltline. <br />237 July 11 RRAR Currently I support improvement up to and including post office, sidewalks on both <br /> sides of street, and one bike path on south side of street. Wait for improvement on <br /> remainder of street east of post office until OOOT deCides what they are going to <br /> do with the east end of River Avenue. then I feel what's required is one sidewalk <br /> on south side and share with bikes; center lane with no islands, thus giving semi <br /> trucks and trailers more move ability for entrance and exit to businesses. <br />238 July 18 ESC Don't create needless impervious surface <br />239 July 18 ESC Don't want to set orecedent that we won't build facilities because it's expensive. <br />240 July 18 EBC ODOT should add third lane on Beltline <br />241 July 18 ESe Previous meeting <br /> Sidewalks both sides to post office <br /> South side bike path to end <br /> +22 ceo ole opposed proceedina until OOOT studY of Beltllne completed <br />242 July 18 ESC We don't have to build anvthinQ elaborate <br />243 July 18 SCCO OOOT's ambiguous plans for Beltline on ramp are confusing to the project. <br /> Clarification would help. <br /> <br />PO = Property Owner <br />SCCO = Santa Clara Community Organization <br />RRAR = River Road Area Residents <br />EBC = Eugene Bicycle Coalition <br /> <br />River Avenue Transportation Improvements <br />Summary of Outreach Comments <br />June/July 2005 p 9 of 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.