Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ATTACHMENT A <br /> <br /> <br />THE TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1996 - WHAT IT MEANT TO EUGENE, OREGON <br />Historical Development of Ordinance 20083 (1997) <br /> <br /> <br />From Threats to Opportunities <br />Upon the passage of the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 (the Act), the largest overhaul of the <br />nation’s telecommunication laws since 1934, the Eugene City council began study of the National <br />League of Cities Local Officials Guide: The Telecommunications Act of 1996, What it Means to Local <br />Governments. The Guide was prepared to ensure, to the best extent possible, that local government re- <br />sponses to the Act could withstand legal scrutiny. A copy has been placed in the council office. <br />Eugene’s need for a comprehensive telecommunications plan was driven by two key events. First was <br />the passage of the Act which established a host of new rules and criteria for local government’s manage- <br />ment of the public rights-of-way (ROW), established provisions barring local governments from being <br />‘barriers to entry”, cited level playing field standards, and much more in a comprehensive but somewhat <br />inadequately defined bill. Second, the sweeping changes in the telecommunications industry meant <br />Eugene had to prepare itself for new providers entering our market and increased placement of telecom- <br />munications towers and other infrastructure in the public ROW and other areas of the community. It was <br />clear that Eugene’s Municipal Code needed immediate updating. <br />The city council formed a Telecommunications Committee consisting of three city councilors and two <br />citizens (the Chair of the Planning Commission and the Chair of the Budget Committee). The Committee <br />conducted a year-long series of public meetings, hearings, and outreach to telecommunications and cable <br />providers. <br />Study, Public Involvement, and Council Action <br />1996-97 Process <br /> <br />?Forums were conducted for both the public and the telecommunications industry to provide input <br />to the plan. Providers from both the wire line and wireless industry participated in the forums. <br /> <br />? Consultants reported on the telecommunications needs of the community and legal ramifications <br />of the Act. Their reports emphasized the importance of the use of telecommunications technology <br />by the public sector to improve all of its services to the community, especially public safety. The <br />committee also discussed the ramifications of being on the wrong side of the digital divide and <br />the value of telecommunications investments in our community and within the City organization. <br />These discussions led to the recommendation for a 2% dedicated business privilege tax (called a <br />registration fee in the ordinance). <br /> <br />?A Wireless Siting Study was completed which led to an update of the City's land use regulations. <br />An innovative tiered approach uses co-location incentives for providers, enabling the wireless in- <br />dustry to serve the Eugene region while minimizing the impact of towers. <br /> <br />?A national expert was employed to assist the committee in the development of telecommunica- <br />tions vision and policies. These policies became the foundation for the City’s ordinances. <br /> <br /> <br />