Laserfiche WebLink
<br />interests of families that live in the CR project area. We think OUf efforts represent <br />informed public involvement at its best, and we hope City officials will respect <br />and heed our observations and recommendations. <br /> <br />Additional background <br /> <br />The City of Eugene has a broad policy to promote higher-denslty residential <br />development within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). As discussed in the next <br />section of this report, the City has also adopted explicit policies to protect the <br />character of existing residential neighborhoods, including those within the CR <br />project area. Unfortunately, over the past twenty or so years, the City has done a <br />great deal to allow and require greater density, but has done almost nothing to <br />protect neighborhood character. <br /> <br />As part of the attempt to increase density, the City has previously taken several <br />actions in the CR project area, including zoning changes (e.g., from R-I to R-2 <br />and R-3). The City has also significantly increased the number of units required <br />and allowed on R-2 lots, which is the designation for a large section of the CR <br />project area that was historically a single-family residential neighborhood. In <br />addition, various City planning activities have considered sections ofthe CR <br />project area that are currently zoned R-l as potential areas for increased density <br />(Le., by changing the zoning). <br /> <br />As a result of increased densities allowed (and required in many cases) in <br />established single-family sections of the CR project area, additional houses and <br />apartments have been added to lots that were originally occupied by a single <br />home. A few of these additions have been attractive, appropriately-scaled, well- <br />sited dwellings that enhance the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Unfortunately, however, most infill structures in this area have been sited and <br />built in ways that erode the neighborhood character and degrade existing <br />residents' privacy, safety, and peaceful enjoyment of their own homes and streets. <br />For many years, residents in the CR project area have tried unsuccessfully to get <br />the City to help protect their neighborhoods from the impacts of poorly-sited, <br />badly-designed, and overbuilt infill. <br /> <br />Beginning in the late 199Os, the City has also attempted to promote denser <br />development by establishing mixed-use residential centers (aka "MUCs" or <br />"nodes") that are compact, pedestrian-friendly, and well-served by public <br />transportation. The City is now in the process of its third attempt (Le., the current <br />"Chambers Revisited" project) to further nodal development in the area around <br />the intersection of West 11111 Avenue and Chambers Street. During each of these <br />three attempts, neighbors have strongly expressed their concerns over the harmful <br />impact of poorly sited and designed infill. Neighbors have voiced similar <br />concerns about potential redevelopment of both residential and non-residential <br />parts of the CR project area. <br /> <br />As the CR project was launched, city staff repeatedly emphasized to CR residents <br />that this project was meant to help address residents' long-standing concerns by <br />developing - and proposing for adoption by City Council- effective infill and <br />redevelopment siting and design standards <br /> <br />November 1, 2005 <br /> <br />Chambers Revisited - Neighbors' Report <br /> <br />5 <br />