Laserfiche WebLink
Pro Con <br />targeted by the tax. <br />Source will grow as community needs <br />increase <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION B. REGIONAL APPROACH <br /> <br />One plan, three jurisdictions <br />The Mayor’s Blue Ribbon Committee was appointed by Eugene and specifically advises the City <br />of Eugene while recommending to all local governments. This committee includes a Lane <br />County Commissioner and a Springfield City Councilor because housing and homeless issues <br />have regional importance. <br /> <br />The City of Eugene has close intergovernmental partnerships with Lane County and Springfield <br />through the Human Services Commission and the Housing Policy Board. Eugene and <br />Springfield have formed a consortium to receive federal HOME funds. Eugene worked closely <br />with Lane County in developing a Ten Year Plan to End Chronic Homelessness. <br /> <br />The Blue Ribbon Committee encourages Lane County and Springfield to work closely with <br />Eugene to provide similar funding levels for housing and homelessness or place a similar <br />initiatives on their respective ballots at the same time. All three jurisdictions could then benefit <br />from increased investment and a single voter education effort. If Lane County approved a <br />funding source it would raise revenue from Eugene and Springfield residents, possibly negating <br />the need for specific funding in those cities. <br /> <br />The Blue Ribbon Committee also recommends that each jurisdiction advocate for improved <br />legislation and funding to address these issues. This can be accomplished in the State of Oregon <br />by joining the “Housing Alliance” and at the federal level through the “United Front” process. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION C. CHANGES IN GOVERNMENT POLICIES <br /> <br />Review the impacts of existing regulations <br />The Blue Ribbon Committee is concerned about unintended consequences associated with <br />existing laws and policies. Many regulations that were adopted to respond to important <br />community needs indirectly contribute to the housing and homelessness crisis. These include <br />codes related to land use, growth management, sustainability and livability. It may be that <br />improved “livability” for some is accomplished through limited housing options for those with <br />fewer resources. <br /> <br />Locally, the Blue Ribbon Committee recommends that each jurisdiction ensure that they are <br />carefully considering the impacts on low-income households and potential homelessness as part <br />of ongoing planning efforts. For instance, in Eugene there are potential impacts associated with <br />the minor code amendment, in-fill and opportunity siting processes. Jurisdictions are <br />encouraged to appoint a special task force that can examine local codes with regard to affordable <br />housing and homelessness and make recommendations to Planning Commissions or elected <br />officials. <br />15 <br />Blue Ribbon Committee on Homelessness, Recommendation April 2, 2008 -- Page <br />