Laserfiche WebLink
using that experience and to engaging the neighbors to create a plan that addressed their concerns when the new arena <br />was in place. <br /> <br />Betty Snowden <br />, 125 West Broadway, supported the proposed vacations. She asked the council to hold the vote in a <br />timely way as the UO was ready to build. MacArthur Court needed to be replaced as it was old and expensive to <br />maintain. She thought the new arena would be a community asset that created new jobs and would boost the local <br />economy. She pointed out that no taxpayer money was being used to fund the arena. The arena would be LEED- <br />certified, and she pointed out “we’re very big on that.” The arena would be used for many community purposes, <br />increase the UO’s profile, benefit the academic mission, and attract more students. She said the UO would be <br />winning championships. Ms. Snowden said “Go Ducks!” <br /> <br />Marvin Roevell <br />, 2924 Adams Street, hoped the council voted to support the vacations soon. He said several <br />members of his family had attended the UO and the university meant a lot to his family. He considered the UO and <br />the arena to be a sustainable business. He said he owned a multi-generational company that included his son and <br />niece and the arena would benefit small businesses such as his. He said that the arena proposal was not just about <br />sports and commencements, it was about sustainable business. <br /> <br />Vin Lannana <br />, a resident of the Fairmount Neighborhood and the Associate Director of Athletics, thanked the <br />council, Mayor, and staff for the successful collaboration between the UO and City during the recent Olympic Trials, <br />which were a success due to that collaboration. He said much trepidation had existed around the trials in regard to <br />parking and accommodations, but community confidence made it a success. He thought a delay on the vote would be <br />“a crime,” as much time and energy had gone into the proposal before the council. He said that the arena would be a <br />spectacular community addition. He supported a council vote prior to the council recess. <br /> <br />Tom Kammas <br />, a local business owner, urged the council to vote on the arena right away to set a precedent and <br />demonstrate to businesses, developers, and other employers who want to come to Eugene that it was possible to work <br />with the City. <br /> <br />Rick Satre <br />, Satre Associates, 101 East Broadway, reviewed the applicable criterion, that of the benefit to the public. <br />He suggested the council ask if the two right-of-way segments were needed by the public. He thought the council <br />could demonstrate that the public interest was served both in regard to transportation access and emergency services <br />and utility access. In regard to transportation access and emergency services, Mr. Satre noted that the City’s Public <br />Works Department had stated that the vacations would not compromise public safety or services. The vehicular <br />th <br />access previously provided by East 13 Avenue was to businesses no longer there, and the applicant was proposing a <br />blanket pedestrian access over the alley to improve existing pedestrian access. In regard to the alley, the businesses <br />that used the alley in the past would all soon be gone, and abutting tax lots consolidated, leaving no reason for the <br />alley and preserving the public interest. In regard to utilities, Mr. Satre said that the affected utility providers <br />provided letters of concurrence for the vacation. <br /> <br />Greg Rikhoff <br />, UO Director of Community Relations, expressed the UO’s support for collaboration with the <br />neighborhood. He described the UO’s engagement with the neighborhood association and its establishment of the <br />Neighborhood Arena Liaison Committee in February 2008, to discuss issues related to the arena impact. The <br />committee had made progress toward agreements that would help inform the conditional use process (CUP) and <br />provide additional neighborhood protection. The UO was committed to ongoing dialogue with the neighbors for <br />improved, refined solutions over time. He said the process did not end with those processes and he was confident <br />collaborative solutions would be found to issues related to the arena’s impact. He said there was not consensus on all <br />issues, but dialogue would continue and the result would be a better product. He asked the council to support the <br />vacations. He indicated the UO’s support for the neighborhood suggestion that the money from the sale of the <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 21, 2008 Page 10 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />