Laserfiche WebLink
money in from out of town. Mr. Hauser pointed out the arena would depend on alternative modes of transportation <br />and would be another LEED-certified building. On behalf of the chamber, he supported the project and urged the <br />City Council to continue to be a collaborative partner with the UO and act in a timely manner. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy then called on those who were neutral in regard to the application. <br /> <br />Art Paz <br />, 86950 Cedar Flat Road, suggested the council consider the public realm and the need to preserve an <br />interface between the building and the general public. He believed that the public realm in any great city is a <br />dedication to the public in a way that serves all the public. He recalled the public input associated with the Franklin <br />Boulevard project and asserted that the public had difficulty in finding out how the UO planned to preserve the <br />infrastructure between the arena and the boulevard. He called on the council to hold a workshop to find out how that <br />could occur. <br /> <br />Jay Purcell <br />, 1648 Orchard Alley, suggested the southern portion of the alley proposed for vacation should remain <br />th <br />open for fire, pedestrian, and bicycle access. In regard to 13 Avenue, he questioned whether the design in place was <br />sufficiently solid to justify giving up the public right-of-way and the City’s ability to restore it to the way it was when <br />Williams Bakery used it for truck ingress and egress. He thought the alley vacation should occur after the CUP was <br />approved and a design was in place. <br /> <br />Mr. Purcell “begged to differ” with those who praised the recent Olympic Trails as many business owners said they <br />were not affected or did not have any business until late at night when the venue closed down. He speculated the <br />same thing would occur with the arena. Mr. Purcell did not think that the EmX bus line could be likened to the <br />transit used to get fans to football games. He said the park and ride facilities worked but there was overflow in south <br />Eugene. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling left the meeting. <br /> <br />th <br />Peter Graycroft <br />, 19 and Orchard, thought the arena would be built and planned to use it, but was concerned there <br />was no master plan in place for the area in question. He suggested that the City could consider Ohio State as a model <br />to consider for what would probably happen in the area. He thought the arena would happen because it needed to, <br />but also thought the neighborhood was correct to use the issue of the alley to raise the issue of public interest. His <br />major concern was parking. He thought the UO wanted excellence in this arena as in all things. Mr. Graycroft said <br />the UO needed to work on its relationship with the neighborhood and the City should use its authority to impose <br />conditions that satisfied the neighborhood and addressed his concerns regarding the lack of a master plan. He said <br />the UO needed to invest in structured parking, and the needs of neighbors in light of their different locations. <br /> <br />Shelly Robertson <br />, a Fairmount resident speaking on behalf of the Fairmount Neighborhood Arena Committee, asked <br />that the record remain open for sufficient time to allow for traffic access and circulation studies to be done and <br />submitted into the record. <br /> <br />th <br />Judy Horstman <br />, 1835 East 28 Avenue, thought the arena would be of tremendous community benefit and for that <br />reason the arena would be in the public benefit. However, she wanted the council to condition the vacation by <br />stipulating the money the UO paid for the vacation would be used to mitigate any negative impacts that the arena <br />created for the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy then called on those who were opposed to the vacations being proposed. <br /> <br />Misha Seymour <br />, 1313 Lincoln Street, #307, disagreed with testimony that the UO wanted to work with the <br />community because of past actions taken by the UO in regard to UO-owned housing. He speculated that many UO <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council July 21, 2008 Page 12 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />