Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Bettman declared that many of the items in the document were far-reaching and would not get <br />passed by the council. She felt many updates had not been made to the document. She did not know <br />whether the council supported the “Big Look.” She did not know whether the City really wanted to “further <br />gut” the land use system by amending BM 49. <br /> <br />Ms. Wilson said the Big Look Task Force was currently meeting and would present its recommendation to <br />the Legislature shortly. <br /> <br />Councilor Bettman observed that the Legislative Document indicated council support before the council had <br />seen it. Ms. Wilson affirmed this. She explained that the document was general and was not usually used <br />by lobbying staff except in an emergency. She stressed that it was important to remember that the CCIGR <br />would review all bills that pertained to the City on a case-by-case basis. She said while the City might <br />support the Governor’s transportation funding bill, which called for a two-cent per gallon state gas tax <br />increase, if it preempted the local gas tax the City might have a different position on it. She reiterated that <br />they reserved the right to look at every bill because the “devil is in the details.” <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor appreciated the work done on reformatting the document. He commended the CCIGR on <br />the work they had done to make it more understandable. He said the reason he did not feel a need to go into <br />great detail on it at the current meeting was that, as the legislative session progressed, the individual bills <br />that would be proposed would be discussed at length in the CCIGR. He stated that overall he supported the <br />document as written. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka also appreciated the format, calling it easy to follow. He asked if Ms. Wilson knew how <br />the two-cent gas tax would be allocated. Ms. Wilson responded that a 50:30:20 split was being recom- <br />mended that should put an additional $91 million into local government. She said the City of Eugene’s share <br />was based on its percentage of the population of the State of Oregon, estimated to provide the City with $5.3 <br />million. She noted that there were other funding mechanisms in the package such as doubling the state <br />titling fee and doubling the registration fee. She related that the House Transportation Committee had <br />authorized the drafting of a bill that would eliminate the need for counties to go out to voters to increase <br />their registration fees. She called it a “tool box of funding options” for the State. She said a committee <br />would be convened under the Governor’s recommendation to look for a long-term permanent replacement <br />for the gas tax since they believed it was a diminishing funding resource. She added that the Senate also <br />authorized a bill to be drafted that would eliminate the gas tax based on a dollar amount and replace it with <br />one based on percentage of sales. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka asked if there was any word from the gas station lobby. Ms. Wilson responded that they <br />would tend to support an increase in the gas tax at the state level as long as local governments were <br />preempted. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka recalled that when the Transportation Committee had been convened they had been <br />“stymied” because registration fees could only be increased at the County level. He asked if it would be <br />possible for the City to look at a registration fee at the local level. Ms. Wilson replied that they could look <br />at it. She noted that Representative Beyer served as the Chair of the House Transportation Committee, and <br />might be amenable to allowing an amendment to allow cities to also collect registration fees. She said <br />whether there was the political will to do so was a different question. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Councilor Zelenka, Ms. Wilson explained that every property tax exemption <br />reduced the amount of money that went into the General Fund. She said in every session there were so many <br />tax exemption bills on the table it was hard to keep track of them all. She averred that as the session <br />progressed it was not the best exemptions that were passed, but rather the first exemptions that were passed. <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council November 10, 2008 Page 5 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />