Ordinance No. 19713 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Exhibit ~ June I5, I990 REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT (APRIL 1989) GLENWOOD REFINEMENT PLAN The revisions listed below were either recommended by the Glenwood Plannin Team at its meetin of Ma 4 I989 the Eu ene a g g Y ~ g nd Lane County planning comm~ss~ons at their meeting of July I8, I989, or are the result of work sessions held by both the Eugene City Council and the Lane County Board of Commissioners since the public hearing on the draft Glenwood Refinement Plan on October II, I989. The council met on January ~o and 24 and March I4, I990. The board met on December 4, I9$9, and March 27, I990. The City and County members of the Metropolitan Policy Committee met an February 20, I990, to resolve issues. . Revisions recommended by the Planning Team are marked with a ~pt~, by the planning commissions with a ~pc}, and by the elected officials with an eo . ~} The spec~f~c rev~s~ons recommended by each body are listed at the end of this document. Additions to the p]an are shown with underlinin and deletions are shown with ~brackets~. Land Use Element Revision I. ~pc} Add anew implementation strategy under General Land Use Policy 2 on page I6 and renumber subsequent implementation strategies: 2.2 Ex lore the feasibilit of creatin a tax increment district. Consider usin the revenues from the district for such uses as constructin essential infrastructure im rovements increasin housin resources far low- and moderate-income households for subareas I 8 and 9 and reduci n the f i nanci a E burden of i~,~ ~ re- structure im rovements on law- and moderate-income households. Revision 2. ~pc} Add another implementation strategy to General Land Use Policy 2 on page I6: . 2.5 Lane Count shall consider ado tin Eu ene's Mobile Home Park Conversion ordinance far Glenwood in order to rovide rotection to mobile home dwellers in mobile home arks that convert to other uses. Revision 3. ~pc and eo} Add an implementation strategy to General Land Use Pol ~ ~y ~ ~~~ ~;~~,:w .:: 3.3 Consider a cit wide a roach to develo better notification, in- . s ectian and enforcement rocedures for the review of site review a lications. Consideration should be iven to notification of nei hbors when a site review a lication is received.