Laserfiche WebLink
planning commissions. No new evidence shall be considered by the governing <br />bodies. Within 3a days of the last public meeting, each governing body shall <br />approve, modify and approve, or deny each proposed plan amendment by ordi- <br />nance with adopted findings and conclusions an whether the proposal ar m~di- <br />fied proposal meets the approval criteria. The provisions of section 9.132 <br />~4} apply if the governing bodies da not adopt identical plan amendments. <br />9.13fi Metro Plan - P1 an Amendment Processes; General Provisions. <br />~1} Process for overnment-initiated lan amendments. A different <br />process or timeline than the procedures and timelines specified in sections <br />9.13a, 9.132, or 9.134 may be established by the governing bodies for the City <br />of Eugene, City of~Springfield and Lane County for any government-initiated <br />plan amendment. The procedures for adoption of a plan update amendment shall <br />be established by these governing bodies on a case-by-case basis. <br />~2} Bar on resubmittal. No plan amendment application to the City <br />of Eugene shall be considered if a substantially similar or identical plan <br />amendment has been denied within the year prior to the application date unless <br />the facts forming the basis far the denial have changed so as to allow approv- <br />al. The planning director shall determine whether the proposed amendment is <br />substantially similar ar identical after providing the applicant with an <br />opportunity to comment vn the matter in writing. <br />~3} Relationshi to refinement lan amendments. An initiation by <br />a governing body of a Metropolitan P1 an amendment which is not consistent <br />with an adopted refinement plan shal ] be deemed to be an initiation of cor- <br />responding refinement plan amendment under section 9.139 of this code. No <br />final action on the refinement plan amendment shall be taken until final <br />action on the Metropolitan Plan amendment. Final adoption of a Metropolitan <br />P1 an amendment ono matter how initiated} which is not consistent with an <br />adopted refinement plan shall also be deemed to be an initiation of a cor- <br />responding refinement plan amendment under section 9.139 of this code. <br />~4} Se_v_er_ability ofplan_ amendment adoption actions. When identi- <br />cal action i s required of two or three governing bodies on a Metropol i tan Plan <br />amendment, and the amendment is a number of different plan changes, the <br />following app]ies. Unless otherwise specified in the adoption ordinance of <br />any of the governing bodies, action by all of the governing bodies to adopt <br />some but not al 1 of the plan changes shal 1 result i n the adopti an of the <br />changes for which there is consensus and the forwarding of only those changes <br />for which there is not consensus to the Metropolitan Policy Committee under <br />sections 9.1324} and 9.1344} of this code, <br />Section 3, Adoption of these revisions to the Eugene Cade, 1911 is <br />consistent with the provisions of the Metropolitan Area General Plan. <br />Section 4. The City Recorder, at the request of, or with the concur- <br />rence of the City Attorney, is authorized to administratively correct any ref- <br />erence errors contained herein, or in other provisions of the Eugene Code, <br />Ordinance - 8 <br />