My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 19757
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 19757
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:46:37 PM
Creation date
1/29/2009 2:11:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
19757
Document_Title
An ordinance levying assessments for sanitary sewers in the River Road area for Basins "A," "B," and "C"; and declaring an emergency.
Adopted_Date
3/4/1991
Approved Date
3/4/1991
CMO_Effective_Date
3/4/1991
Signer
Jeffrey R. Miller
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SUBJECT: BASINS A, B, AND C SANITARY SEWERS IN THE RIVER ROAD <br />AREA LOCAL IlVIPRDVEMENT DISTRICT <br />On May 29, 1990, the City Council initiated the local improvement district for sanitary sewers <br />in the River Road area for basins A, B and C. This district encompasses those parcels served <br />by the sanitary sewer construction in 1990 in the River Road area. The majority of the <br />properties taking sewer access from these facilities will be assessed based on a distribution of <br />the cumulative construction and staff service costs for the three basins and for the sanitary sewer <br />trunk levy of $0.025 per square foot of the total lot area. In Ordinance na. 19725 adopted <br />October 22,1990} the council determined the Trunk Sewer Levy ~$0, 025 per sq. ft. }portion of <br />sanitary sewer assessments in River Road area is to be used to reimburse the City far the cost <br />of the extra capacity required in the sewer interceptor and lateral lines to serve properties within <br />the River Road area. That determination applies to these assessments. <br />In addition, on January 14,1991, the City Council adopted an ordinance which allowed for the <br />collection of a Metropolitan Waste Management Commission ~MWMC} treatment plant <br />reimbursement fee as a part of the assessments. The fee is $212 for a single family dwelling <br />or duplex or for the first 16 fixture units in a new development. The $212 includes $202 base <br />rate plus a $10 administration fee, all of which goes directly to MWMC. The City has included <br />this charge in the assessment so that people will be able to finance that cost with their assessment <br />if they so desire. No additional administration fee is collected by the City. <br />A public hearing regarding assessments for these construction projects was held on February 1$, <br />1991, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers. Hearings Official Jack A. Billings presided, <br />The Hearings Official opened the public hearing by noting that the projects have now been <br />constructed. and the costs are known. The remaining task is to assess these costs to benef~tting <br />properties. The Hearings Official pointed out that a number of factors concerning assessments <br />are already known, since they are governed by City Code and Ordinances. Since the Hearings <br />Official was aware from sign up sheets that several persons appeared unhappy about the MWMC <br />charge, the Hearings Official specifically noted the City Council's action of January 14, 1991. <br />Because of the large number of people wishing to be heard, the Hearings Official also asked that <br />persons commenting limit their remarks to five minutes. <br />The He~.ngs Official then called upon Les Lyle, City Engineer, to present a staff report. Mr. <br />Lyle f rst introduced Michelle Cahill, Project Manager, Keith Martin, Assistant City Attarne <br />. Y <br />and Dave B~edermann, Finance Director for the City. <br />Mr. Lyle noted that City Council action last year had permitted. the construction of the basins <br />A, B and C sewer projects, He noted that the City worked with Lane County while the Count <br />Y <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.