Ordinance No. 19757 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page $ Minutes Mr. Lyle pointed out that the bulk of the large parcel will not be assessed now but would be charged an $ inch equivalent cost when lots are developed and annexed into the City, There was further discussion regarding extra capacity and in the system and a contention that properties currently being assessed ought to be reimbursed when future properties come into the system. Mr. Lyle responded that the treatment plant was for the urban growth boundary and was prudent given the metropolitan area. The MwMC and sewer trunk levy charge are based on what local property owners have paid. Mr. Martin also noted that every property wild pay its share for the larger sizing to accommodate the total area. Mr, Lyle again stated that he thinks the Portland figures are higher than the projects conducted in Eugene, The Hearings official also received a map from City Staff identifying certain properties which were the subject of individual consideration. The Hearings official stated that the official records will remain open for written comment until 5:00 P. M. , on February 26,1991. There being no further testimony to come before the hearing, it was adjourned. Because of questions raised concerning several specific properties, either in written comments, or during the public hearing, the Hearings official personally viewed the following properties: 1. Sam Konnie. The Konnie property is a small shopping center on the east side of River Road. In the Summer of 1990, the River Road widening project took a portion of the Konnie parking area for the shopping center. Property was purchased immediately to the north to provide additional parking for the shopping center. Mr. Konnie testified at the public hearin g and 1t appears that structures were removed and the parking area, patched. tither than si na e . gg for the shopping center, there are no structures on the parking area at this time, 2. River Road Ba tist Church. This situation is quite similar to the Konnie Shoppin Center g matter. There are no structures on the parking area at the present time. 3. Steve and Roberta Thom son Pro e . It appears that two separate homes are constructed on the same lot. Given the nature of this development, it would appear that it occurred man .. y years ago, probably before any zoning or m~n~mum lot size requirements were in place In the County. As noted above, Mr. Thompson testified at the public hearing that there are a number of other similar situations in the area, which have not been required to have double connections from the sewer. Michelle Cahill has conf rmed for the Hearings official that Mr, Thom son's . P ~nformat~on ~s correct.