Laserfiche WebLink
Page 9 <br />Findings & Recommendations <br />FINANCING <br />All properties to be assessed will be eligible for 10-year assessment financing. Law income <br />deferral programs are also available for those property owners that qualify. Qualification will <br />be determined. at the time the financing application is signed, <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATIGN <br />The assessment costs are approximately equal to the estimates given since the bids were opened <br />and the participation of Lane County was identified; the MWMC fee is less. Staff recommends <br />approval of the proposed calculation of equivalency of the cost of an eight-inch sewer (for the <br />sewer constructed by Lane County} and proposed calculation of the price per unit for the <br />sanitary sewer lateral and service lines. Staff also recommends approval of the calculation of <br />proposed assessments on each parcel of land or lot as set forth on Attachment "A" hereto except <br />for a reduction in the levy amount charged to the Zorn property at 17-04-23-24-4101. Approval <br />of the assessments shown on Attachment "A" will incorporate Hearings Gff~cial's <br />recommendation on the issues discussed above concerning vacant lots, services and the MWMC <br />fee. <br />FINDINGS AND REC4MMENDATI4N GF THE HEARINGS GFFICIAL <br />In preparation for the public hearing held an February 1$,1991, the Hearings Gfficial received <br />considerable information from the City, including a Staff Memorandum which contained much <br />of the information set forth above. Accompanying the Staff Memorandum were a number of <br />attachments, including comments from various property owners. Additional information was <br />received by City Staff ar the Hearings Gfficial following the public hearing and before the close <br />of testimony on February 2,1991 at 5:00 P.M, In response to questions posed by the Hearings <br />Gff~cial, City Staff has provided further information. The letters of property owners and further <br />remarks of staff are attached. A listing is provided as Attachment "B" . <br />As noted, there have been a few circumstances in which the determination of the Hearings <br />Ufficial and recommendation to the City Council is different than originally proposed by City <br />Staff. If adopted by the City Council, the proposed assessments for several properties will need <br />to be re-calculated. The Hearings Gfficial has been advised by staff that Exhibit "A" contains <br />those adjustments. However, the assessments for all the rest of the properties would remain the <br />same. <br />It is the finding of the Hearings Gff~cial that the assessment process proposed and developed by <br />City Staff is consistent with the Eugene City Cade and fairly and appropriately assesses <br />properties in the three improvement districts for the sanitary sewers. <br />