My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 19757
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 19757
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:46:37 PM
Creation date
1/29/2009 2:11:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
19757
Document_Title
An ordinance levying assessments for sanitary sewers in the River Road area for Basins "A," "B," and "C"; and declaring an emergency.
Adopted_Date
3/4/1991
Approved Date
3/4/1991
CMO_Effective_Date
3/4/1991
Signer
Jeffrey R. Miller
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
February 5 , 19 9 l <br />To : City o f Eugene <br />From: Steve and Roberta Thompson <br />4 6 81 Fuller dive . <br />Eugene, aR 97442 <br />Re: River Road Sewer Project <br />Property - 15 3 Elkay Dr. ~~ <br />We would 1~ike to get the .facts down on paper concerning the sewer <br />service to 153 Elkay Dr. ~1e would 1 ike to sta ~e, too, that each <br />time we communicate with your office we are gi~len a dif ferent reason <br />as to why 2 service lines are needed . A brief sequence of events <br />will show our perspective: <br />- June 11 ~ S eve attended an information meeting at North Eugene <br />High . A man representing the city stated in writing that our <br />property ~rould require 2 service lines and gave a rough estimate <br />of the costs. <br />- We were sent a form requesting our preference of placement of tie <br />access ~ i ne . We returned the f orrn showing ~he 1 i ne to be on the <br />east side. <br />- A woman came by and began marking the service access on the west <br />side. Steve spoke with her and corrected the error. She <br />remarked ~he access and proceeded to talk with Steve about the <br />hook up. She stated that it would be necessary to run 2 lines <br />since there are two houses on the property . <br />During the summer, we contacted Eric Jones several times by <br />phone. He first cited the rule which says hat twv dwellings <br />not connected by one roof must have separate service lines . <br />Steve argued that to him this was not a valid reason for the <br />extra charge. <br />- Steve went down to the office to talk with Eric in person. They <br />talked at length and this time Eric brought up the subdividing <br />issue. Sieve told him that we bought it wi~h the understanding <br />that it could never be subdivided. Eric did not offer to <br />research his or tell us where to find out . Steve wanted further <br />explanation and Eric said he would get back to him. <br />- Eric never d~.d contact us . Steve went down again . Basically tie <br />same conversation resulted with Steve requesting to see his <br />si~pe.rvisor. Er?e said that it would benefi. ~ Steve more to just <br />go to the February 1~ meeting and that Michelle would be there <br />to give a better explanation. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.