Laserfiche WebLink
February 2 5 , 19 9l <br />Dear Mr . B i 11 i ngs , <br />we left the hearing on tre 18th of February feeling that <br />the real issue of whether two service lines are needed was not <br />throughly discussed. Unfortunately, the issue of similar <br />surrounding properties took precedence. I'd like to back up <br />and take a look at the city's reasoning again . Les, Lyle .responGed <br />to Steve by saying that ,the city long ago decided that every <br />dwelling ~~ould be charged for a service line. I have to believe <br />that this was not very well trought out. They say it was to <br />equalize ~he disbursement of cost to all affected by the project . <br />But duplexes are not charged a double fee. How is our lot <br />different than a duplex? <br />I n regards to the similar properties , ~~e certainly don' t <br />wish to increase anyone else's costs. We only wanted to bring <br />to light a potential inequal.tty. <br />we feel that this issue of two houses on one lot was over- <br />looked in the planning of the sewer project, We can understand <br />hoW that could happen, given the complexity and size of the work <br />to be done . However, might we be akin to the proverbial guinea <br />pig in the initial stages of this sewer "experiment?" Michelle <br />Cahill recently said over the phone, in response to my question <br />of what the next course of action would be, "We'll make sure <br />that these situations aren't overlooked. " ; my interpretation~~ <br />We don't feel that we should rave to absorb the cast of the <br />city's oversights , we just want our assessment to be a fair <br />one. one that has some logic and reason behind it. <br />Having just spoken with Michelle aver she phone, it seems <br />that now ~he issue is whether to establish new warding in the <br />service line guidelines. Z realize that a precedent will be set <br />with this case. My question is why, in our specific situation, <br />where the lot cannot be divided, couldn't the property owner <br />install his own Y . This would save money for everyone, including the ci~ <br />The functionability of the service wouldn't be changed and the ~;~ <br />owner of Mhe proper would be able to deal with an noble ~ <br />tY y p ms <br />between the two dwellings. <br />Tn closing I would like to take the liberty to let our <br />situation be known. According to some of the deferral information <br />sheets , we sit ,around the poverty level financially . My husbanc <br />makes ~ 11 ~a a month. and I am a homemaker raising our two children . <br />Before my Grandfather died, he sold us the property at 153 Elkay <br />Drive with the agreement that my Grandmother live there until <br />she died . ~ My mother lives ir. the other house . Needless to say <br />