My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 19762
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1990s No. 19660-20183
>
Ordinance No. 19762
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:46:39 PM
Creation date
1/29/2009 2:19:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
19762
Document_Title
An ordinance amending the Bethel-Danebo Refinement Plan (Media Crafts Associates, RA 90-2)
Adopted_Date
4/22/1991
Approved Date
4/22/1991
CMO_Effective_Date
5/23/1991
Signer
Jeffrey R. Miller
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Section 9.47S~d}: The existing development has occurred over a period <br />of years and is characterized by a mixture of uses. <br />The applicant's statement indicates that the existing industrial building was <br />constructed beginning in 1927 with additions in 1938 and 1974. Other struc- <br />tures on the property were also placed on the property or constructed over a <br />period of years. The existing development includes a residence, industrial <br />buildings, and a vacant fire station, which appears to represent a mixture of <br />uses on the development site. <br />Section 9.418~e}: The uses and development standards of conventional <br />residential, commercial, yr industrial zoning districts are not capable <br />of or suitable for promoting the internal compatibility and integration <br />with the surrounding area prescribed by the area special study. <br />The primary reason this property should be considered for mixed-use develop- <br />ment is because of the existing mix of buildings on the property. The two <br />existing industrial buildings do not appear to have any appropriate use under <br />the uses permitted in the low-density residential zoning districts. <br />~n review of the commercial zoning districts, the <br />district would allow a wider range of uses and as <br />zone change request, has been found to be unsuita <br />noted in the applicant's statement, the C-2 and C <br />either be inconsistent with the Metropolitan plan <br />would open up too wide a variety of uses. <br />Neighborhood Commercial <br />is evident from the earlier <br />b1e for this property. As <br />-3 zoning district would <br />direction for this area or <br />In conclusion, staff feels that this property should have special considera- <br />tion that can only be provided by the Mixed Use district concept. The uses <br />and development standards proposed with the modifications suggested by staff <br />will result in promoting compatibility with the surrounding neighborhood as <br />well as providing efficient use of the existing buildings on the property. <br />Section 9.478~f}: The uses permitted and the development standards to <br />be applied in the district will be consistent with the criteria required <br />for approval of a conventional zone change. <br />The applicant's statement prawides a detailed analysis under this criteria <br />that is supported by staff. If the Planning Commission and City Council <br />ultimately approve this refinement plan amendment and Mixed-Use zoning dis- <br />trict, a zone change would be considered by the Eugene Hearings Official to <br />apply the Mixed-Use district to this property and a further evaluation would <br />be made using the normal zone change criteria. <br />Concl us i ons__ and Recommendation an ,,Mixed-Use Zani ng.,,_Di stri ct <br />The evaluation presented above as well as the applicant's statement shows <br />that the draft Mixed-Use district would provide reasonable use of the proper- <br />ty, while maintaining the public interest in protecting the surrounding resi- <br />dential neighborhood. with the modifications proposed to the draft Mixed Use <br />district as listed under Section 9.478~b} relating to height limitation and <br />site review process for new non residential development in new structures, <br />STAFF NOTES--Eugene Planning Commission January 22, 1991 Page 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.