Laserfiche WebLink
URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2300.dir/hb2379.intro.pdf <br />RespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Contact <br />Larry Hill Larry Hill CS-FIN 1/15/2009 Pri 2 Yes YesII. B1 Oppose <br />Comments: <br />HB 2379 would create entirely new statutory language that would impose a new state <br />cigarette tax in addition to the existing state cigarette tax. The new stature would impose <br />distribution schedule for the new revenue that would result in cities and counties <br />receiving far smaller share that is recieved under the existing cigarette tax statutes. This <br />would mean a net reduction in the percentage share of total cigarette tax revenue that the <br />City of Eugene and other local government would receive. <br />The alterntive that the City should support should be a simple increase in the existing <br />cigaterre tax while the current percentage shares of total revenue are maintained as they <br />are. <br />The City of Eugene's current share of state cigerette tax revenue will be an estimated <br />$262,000 in FY09. Cities may use their share for general government purposes, without <br />program restrictions on their use. <br />Oregon’s cigarette tax was approved in 1967. When it passed, the tax was $0.04 per <br />pack, with 50 percent of the tax designated for property tax relief and 50 percent to be <br />distributed to cities and counties. Since then, the amount of tax on cigarettes has <br />increased but cities’ proportionate share of the tax revenue has shrunk, from 33 percent <br />to just 1.7 percent of the total tax (a second penny was added for cities in 1986). <br />The current tax rate is $1.18 per pack of 20 cigarettes. Despite the tax increase, cigarette <br />tax revenues have generall been declining each year. Revenue from the tax is allocated <br />as follows: $0.22 to the State General Fund, $0.87 to the Oregon Health Plan, $0.02 to <br />cities, $0.02 to counties, $0.02 to the Oregon Department of Transportation for <br />transportation services to the elderly and disabled, and $0.03 to the Tobacco Use <br />Reduction Account. <br />HB 2385 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to smoking in a motor vehicle. <br />Title: Creates offense of smoking in motor vehicle while person under age of 17 is in motor <br />vehicle. Punishes by maximum fine of $90 for first offense, $180 for second offense and <br />$360 for third or subsequent offense. <br />Sponsored by: By Representative RILEY; Representatives HOLVEY, KOMP, Senator BURDICK <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2300.dir/hb2385.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />ECushman D. Schulz EPD-ADM 1/19/2009 Pri 3 No No Neutral <br />Comments: <br />This bill is really a bill related to public health, rather than to traffic safety or any other <br />area in which law enforcement agencies normally operate. From a public health <br />standpoint, it is arguably a good thing to keep those under age 17 from suffering the <br />effects of second-hand smoke while inside a vehicle. However, enforcement would be <br />difficult and, given the necessary emphasis on enforcing traffic laws which directly relate <br />to driving behaviors that result in traffic crashes, could not be an enforcement priority. <br />SB 0024 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to health benefit plan coverage of telemedical services. <br />Title: Requires health benefit plan to provide coverage of medically necessary, evidence-based <br />telemedical health service that meets specified criteria if health service is otherwise <br />covered by plan. <br /> Applies to plans contracted for or renewed on or after <br />effective date of Act. <br />Sponsored by: Senate Interim Committee on Health and Human Services <br />12 <br /> <br />