Laserfiche WebLink
SB 5548 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to financial administration of the Department of Transportation; appropriating <br />money; declaring an emergency. <br />Title: Appropriates moneys from General Fund to Department of Transportation for rail <br />programs. <br /> Limits certain biennial expenditures from fees, moneys or other revenues, including <br />Miscellaneous Receipts and certain federal funds, but excluding lottery funds and other <br />federal funds, collected or received by department. <br /> Limits biennial expenditures by department from federal funds. <br /> Limits certain biennial expenditures by department from lottery moneys. <br /> Authorizes specified nonlimited expenditures. <br /> Declares emergency, effective July 1, 2009. <br />Sponsored by: Budget and Management Division, Oregon Department of Administrative Services <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb5500.dir/sb5548.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Eric Jones Eric Jones PW-ADM 1/14/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesIII. A Neutral <br />Comments: <br />Typically the City does not advocate state agency budget bills. This bill, sponsored by the <br />Oregon Department of Administrative Services, appears to establish budget limitations in <br />various ODOT expenditure categories. This reviewer is unable to determine if the <br />proposed limitations are appropriate. It does seem to be putting the cart before the horse <br />to set categorical expenditure limitations before the broader questions of transportation <br />funding needs and potential source of additional transportation revenues have been <br />discussed by the Legislature. <br />Several additional factors should be considered in reviewing this bill: <br />- It should be determined that the limitations set forth would in no way restrict or reduce <br />the amount of funding the city receives via highway trust fund allocations or other <br />revenue-sharing agreements from ODOT "fees, moneys or other revenues." <br />- It should be determined that the limitations set forth would not limit or preclude the <br />amount of funding the state and/or the city might receive through federal economic <br />stimulus payments (that appears to be addressed in the preamble to section 2). <br />- It is unclear to this reviewer what "rail programs" are (i.e., how the addtional $1.2 million <br />from the state general fund would be spent). <br />SJR 2 <br />Relating Clause: Proposing amendment to Oregon Constitution relating to surplus corporate income or <br />excise tax revenue. <br />Title: Proposes amendment to Oregon Constitution to transfer surplus corporate income or <br />excise tax revenue to reserve fund intended to provide funding in response to economic <br />decline. <br /> Refers proposed amendment to people for their approval or rejection at next general <br />election. <br />Sponsored by: Senate Interim Committee on Finance and Revenue <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sjr1.dir/sjr0002.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Larry Hill Larry Hill CS-FIN 1/20/2009 Pri 3 Yes II Support <br />Comments: <br />SJR 2 proposes a constitutional amendment they would fund a state rainy day reserve <br />fund with tax revenue currently subject to the tax kicker refund provision. The measure <br />would be placed on the next general election ballot. <br />19 <br />