Laserfiche WebLink
SB 0263 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to damages. <br />Title: <br />Increases amount of noneconomic damages that may be awarded in civil action seeking <br />damages arising out of bodily injury. <br /> Corrects inaccurate reference for definition. <br />Sponsored by: Senate Interim Committee on Judiciary <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0200.dir/sb0263.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Jamie Iboa Cathy Joseph CS-HRRS 1/27/2009 No No Monitor <br />Comments: <br />Will not have a significant financial impact on the City. <br />SB 0269 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to relocation of utility facilities. <br />Title: <br />Prescribes manner in which public body may require utility to relocate facilities legally <br />located on property constituting public highway. Provides that public body may require <br />relocation to extent necessary to accommodate public purpose construction projects. <br />Provides that public body may require relocation for benefit of private party, or to allow <br />private party to comply <br />with conditions of approval for private development, only if private party pays costs incurred <br />by utility. Allows utility to recover from retail customers total unreimbursed costs of <br />relocation activities required by public body. <br />Sponsored by: Senate Interim Committee on Judiciary <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0200.dir/sb0269.intro.pdf <br />RespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Contact <br />Pam Berrian Pam Berrian CS-ISD 1/27/2009 Pri 1 Yes IX Oppose <br />Comments: <br />Also likely that S269 violates Public Work's legislative policies as well. Pre-emption of local <br />authority, and specifically pre-emption of Telecom Ord 20083 (1997) and related Admin <br />Orders. In addition, likely pre-emption of other public rights of way use agrements for <br />commercial providers such as for natural gas, electicity, water, sewer, railroad, and cable <br />TV. Would increase City costs and costs of local PUD developments by changing the <br />hundred-years old philosophy that utiliites have a conditional privlege, not a right, to use <br />public rights of way and that when a public purpose --deemed by the City -- requires their <br />relocation to a like location, they must do so at their own expense. <br />SB 0278 <br />Relating Clause: Relating to forfeitures. <br />Title: <br />Decreases time within which forfeiting agency must prepare notice of seizure. <br />Sponsored by: Senate Interim Committee on Judiciary <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/sb0200.dir/sb0278.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />E. Cushman R. Barrong EPD-ADM 1/26/2009 Pri 3 No No Monitor <br />Comments: <br />As currently written, we do not believe this bill will have enough of an impact on EPD or the <br />City to actively lobby against the bill. Monitor for amendments which could change this. <br />24 <br /> <br />