My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 19300
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
1980s No. 18550-19659
>
Ordinance No. 19300
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 3:44:01 PM
Creation date
2/11/2009 1:06:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
19300
Document_Title
Concerning historic landmarks; amending Sections 2.403, 2.404, 2.405, 2.406, 2.407, 2.408, 2.409, 2.410, 2.411, 2.412, 9.488, 9.489, 9.490 and 9.608 of the Eugene Code, 1971; and declaring an emergency.
Adopted_Date
12/12/1984
Approved Date
12/12/1984
CMO_Effective_Date
12/12/1984
Signer
Barbara Keller
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~Z} Application for such a permit shall be made to the building <br />official and shall be referred to the planning department, accompanied by <br />the building official's report indicating whether it is technically feasible <br />to move the historic landmark. <br />~3~ The board shall conduct a public hearing within 45 days <br />following receipt of an application by the building official. At least ten <br />days prior to the hearing the planning department shall mail written notice <br />thereof to the owner and occupants, the applicant, and to abutting property <br />owners and occupants, including owners and occupants of property which would <br />be abutting if there were no intervening streets, <br />~4~ Within 15 days following completion of the hearing, the board <br />shall make specific findings whether moving or demolition should be permit- <br />ted. The board' s ~deci s i an shat 1 be based on the f al 1 owi ng criteria; <br />~a~ whether the historic landmark constitutes a hazard to <br />the safety of the public or its occupants; <br />(b} Whether an improvement project of substantial benefit <br />to the city and which cannot be reasonably located elsewhere <br />overrides the public's interest in the preservation of the <br />historic landmark; <br />~c} Whether retention of the historic landmark would <br />cause financial hardship to the owner not outweighed by the <br />public interest in the landmark's preservation; <br />~d~ Whether retention of the historic landmark would <br />be in the best interests of a majority of the citizens of the <br />city, and, if not, whether the historic landmark may be <br />alternatively preserved by means of photographs, pictures, item <br />removal, written description, measured drawings, sound retention <br />or other means of limited or special preservation; and <br />fie} Applicable criteria in section 2.4ag. <br />~5~ In all cases where application has been made for moving or <br />demolition of an historic landmark, the board and historic landmark owner <br />shall endeavor to prepare an economically feasible plan for preservation of <br />the historic landmark. The board and owner shall also explore the possibil- <br />ities of purchase of the historic landmark by interested persons ar organi- <br />zations. The board shall include an accounting of these endeavors in its <br />findings, <br />,~5~ The board may decide to postpone action upon the application <br />fvr a period not to exceed six months. The board must demonstrate in its <br />findings that there is a program under way which would result in public or <br />private acquisition, preservation ar renovation of the historic landmark, <br />and that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the program may be <br />successful. <br />~l} Persons aggrieved by the board's decision may appeal to the <br />planning commission by filing a written notice with the planning department. <br />The notice must be filed within ten days of the date of the board's deci- <br />sion and state specifically wherein there was error. Unless the applicant <br />and appellant agree to a longer time period, the commission shall hold a <br />hearing to allow oral argument on the appeal within 30 days of its receipt. <br />At least ten days prior to the hearing, the planning department shall mail <br />written notice thereof to the applicant, appellant, and parties who request- <br />ed nvt~ce of the previous decision. Unless the applicant and appellant <br />agree to a longer time period, the commission shall make a decision within <br />Ordinance -~ 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.