My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 01/11/06 WS
>
Item A: River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:04:52 PM
Creation date
1/6/2006 2:37:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Benchmarks <br /> <br />In undertaking research for this White Paper, and identifying initiatives and options that may work for the <br />City of Eugene, other local service providers, and the communities of River Road and Santa Clara, six <br />“unifying” categories were considered. Although the options contained herein are listed by service type, <br />they could as well have been listed by the categories below. These categories could potentially be <br />“themes” around which one or more transition and heritage strategies coalesce. Note: In many instances <br />these categories will overlap. For example, initiatives and options involving local fire protection service <br />could be discussed in the context of Governance, Institutions, and/or Services. <br /> <br />Governance <br />1. - Options that preserve, or perhaps create, processes that provide residents, <br />business owners, and landowners in the River Road and Santa Clara neighborhoods with a <br />sense of community and of having an effective voice over their future. <br /> <br />Institutions <br />2. – Options that preserve or create institutions (such as community centers, volunteer <br />fire brigades, etc.) that sustain or strengthen the distinct neighborhood identity of the urbanizing <br />areas. <br /> <br />Communications <br />3. – Options that preserve or create outlets and processes for communicating <br />within the neighborhoods, not just for the purpose of assuring that residents know what is going <br />on in the community, but to also foster a sense of neighborhood identity as well. <br /> <br />Landscape <br />4. – Options that allow urbanizing areas to preserve some of the physical attributes of a <br />more rural or suburban community, such as differing street standards, open space, preservation <br />of agricultural lands, lot and housing types, etc. <br /> <br />Phasing <br />5. – Options to phase or time incorporation within the benchmark of feasibility under <br />Oregon statutes. This is not necessarily limited to physical phasing. For instance, the options <br />identified could be a simple as phasing of a City fee. <br /> <br />Services <br />6. – Options for services that are designed primarily to enhance current provisions in the <br />urbanizing areas in ways that address existing community needs, not those of the fully developed <br />“post-incorporation” community (but that still have “utility” for future residents and businesses). <br /> <br />Additionally, in identifying and analyzing the White Paper initiatives and options, the four major themes <br />identified in the 2002 River Road/Santa Clara Urban Services Committee Report were used as <br />“benchmarks” against which the relevance and potential effectiveness of each option was tested. The four <br />, <br />themes/benchmarks are: Trust, Voice, Equity, and Collaboration as defined in the 2002 report. These <br />themes, having been distilled by the very people thinking most deeply about the impact of urbanization <br />and annexation, and being based on what is perceived as being unsatisfactory in the past, provided a <br />unique opportunity to filter results through the lens of the local communities. A fifth benchmark used was <br />Assumptionsand Limitations <br />statutory and policy feasibility, as described in the section of this White <br />Paper. <br />6 <br />River Road/Santa Clara Transition/Heritage White Paper <br />DRAFT <br />11-24-05 <br /> <br />Service provider Review <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.