Laserfiche WebLink
re-designing River Road and Beltline (at least for intermittent sections) to lower classifications, <br />applying traffic calming retrofits to such select areas (the City of Portland has an extensive traffic <br />calming initiative that has been applied to major streets), and/or building grade-separated <br />pedestrian crossing structures. <br /> <br />Advantages: Viable neighborhoods are greatly enhanced by neighborhood centers that foster <br />a sense of place and common neighborhood activity and interaction; centers are <br />vital in preserving the neighborhood’s place name and thus its heritage <br />Challenges: The built configuration of present commercial centers and abutting streets do not <br />lend themselves to supporting viable neighborhood centers; capital infrastructure <br />costs to remove “barriers” to viable neighborhood centers could be high <br /> <br />Option No. 4: Neighborhood Infill Strategies – <br />The City is currently developing “infill” strategies <br />plans and policies for the Eugene as a whole. In Eugene and in other communities that practical <br />application of “building up, instead of out” is often resisted by local neighborhoods in reaction to <br />perceived higher densities, “incompatible” housing styles and other issues. Careful planning and <br />site design can help in mitigating such concerns, while attracting new residents, businesses and <br />investment that may help re-vitalize the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Advantages: Neighborhoods can be greatly enhanced by new residents, businesses, and <br />building; gradual infill can have less overall impact to existing community <br />character than major new developments or market driven increases in housing <br />density and population permitted by general zoning upgrades, infill development <br />can be “directed” to “clusters” where abutting streets, design guidelines and prior <br />development facilitate better integration into the neighborhood <br />Challenges: The “sum” of neighborhood by neighborhood infill strategies may be counter to <br />overall City density goals and requirements; even relatively modest infill <br />development may generate concerns about neighborhood rural or suburban <br />values being lost; in the new world of Measure 37 “takings” issues it may be <br />more difficult to limit infill <br /> <br />What Another Community Has Done <br /> <br /> <br />With respect to neighborhood nodes, the City of Portland, Oregon is notable for the seemingly <br />rd <br />“spontaneous” emergence of many vibrant neighborhood centers (NW 23, Clinton, Alberta, Hawthorne, <br />Belmont, and North Mississippi). These revitalized neighborhood nodes have common characteristics <br />such as relatively narrow primary commercial streets, and a viable stock of architecturally interesting <br />commercial structures built close to the street (and more or less contiguous with each other -- often for <br />several blocks). Neither River Road nor Beltline Road fit this profile. Another interesting characteristic of <br />Portland’s success is that, while the City of Portland and the Portland Development Commission have <br />had important roles, many of these revitalizations have taken hold without significant (or at least primary) <br /> <br />government intervention or involvement. <br />27 <br />River Road/Santa Clara Transition/Heritage White Paper <br />DRAFT <br />11-24-05 <br /> <br />Service provider Review <br /> <br />