My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 01/11/06 WS
>
Item A: River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:04:52 PM
Creation date
1/6/2006 2:37:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
There are no recreation services directly (e.g.: at in-City or in-District fee rates) available to non-City <br />Santa Clara residents, as there is no neighborhood parks and recreation district as in River Road and <br />Lane County does not provide recreation services. All Santa Clara residents may use River Road Parks <br />and Recreation District facilities and programs by paying out-of-District fees. Non-City Santa Clara <br />residents can also use City of Eugene recreation facilities and programs by paying out-of-City fees. <br /> <br />Transition and Heritage Options <br /> <br />River Road <br />Given the apparent popularity with both tax- and fee payers of the River Road Parks and Recreation <br />District, and limited City recreation programs delivered physically within the neighborhood, the City of <br />Eugene and River Road Parks and Recreation District may consider focusing on solutions that perpetuate <br />the District for as long as possible, rather then in negotiating for the end of the District. A viable River <br />Road Parks and Recreation District may also present some opportunities to provide more in- <br />neighborhood recreation services in Santa Clara (see options below). <br /> <br />Please note that some of the options discussed herein for perpetuating the River Road Parks and <br />Recreation District may face significant legal and practical limitations. Put most simply, at the point at <br />which properties in the District are fully incorporated into the City, the District would have no property left <br />to tax to generate operational funds. Even if alternative funding could be found, under State statute (ORS <br />222.510) the continued operation of the District would not be permitted. Any continuance of the District <br />past the point of complete incorporation into the City would have to involve the City withdrawing from <br />providing recreation services to the neighborhood (or the City as a whole), and ceding such services to an <br />expanded District or some other provider (such as Willamalane Parks and Recreation). These and related <br />issues are discussed later in this section of the White Paper. <br /> <br />Santa Clara <br />The above discussion regarding on the River Road Parks and Recreation District begs the question of <br />what happens in Santa Clara, which has no comparable neighborhood governed recreation services. At <br />some point in the past, an expansion of River Road Parks and Recreation to include Santa Clara might <br />have been a potential option. The pace of large tract incorporation and new development in Santa Clara, <br />and the other issues surrounding the continuance of the District, even within its current service territory, <br />may render expansion as an idea whose “time has passed”. <br /> <br />Alternatively, the River Road Parks and Recreation District could effectively expand to Santa Clara by <br />contracting with the City to take over City recreation services in that neighborhood. Issues mitigating <br />against this is the financial ability of the River Road Parks and Recreation District to undertake any <br />necessary capital improvements (or lease of suitable space) in Santa Clara, the presently limited scope of <br />City recreation programs delivered physically within the neighborhood, and whether a sufficient funds <br />transfer could be obtained from the City so that District taxes collected from the River Road neighborhood <br />were not, in effect, partly “transferred” to Santa Clara to subsidize new programs and/or facilities. Finally, <br />there might be some reaction on the part of River Road residents over “their” parks and recreation <br />district’s attention and finances being “diverted” by Santa Clara expansion obligations. <br /> <br />Important note: Although the options presented below are organized into “transition” and “heritage” <br />alternatives and also further sorted by neighborhood, this is only for the purposes of clarity and <br />description. There may be many reasons for two or more options to be selected and combined into an <br />overall strategy for recreation services to River Road and Santa Clara. <br /> <br />Transition Options <br /> <br />Recreation service transition options are those alternatives that support continued recreation programs <br />and services in one or both of the neighborhoods, but for which the ultimate outcome is the eventual <br />replacement of the locally governed service with a City-wide or regional option. <br /> <br />29 <br />River Road/Santa Clara Transition/Heritage White Paper <br />DRAFT <br />11-24-05 <br /> <br />Service provider Review <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.