My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 01/11/06 WS
>
Item A: River Road/Santa Clara Transition Project
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:04:52 PM
Creation date
1/6/2006 2:37:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/11/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
76
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Streets <br /> <br /> <br />Current Situation <br /> <br />Information reviewed concerning neighborhood desires with respect to streets and transportation (such as <br />the 2002 River Road/Santa Clara Urban Services Committee report) indicates that preservation of rural <br />streetscapes in the face of urbanization is second perhaps only to parks and open space as a transition <br />issue impacting the two neighborhood’s rural heritage. The challenge in River Road and Santa Clara is to <br />assure public safety and avoid problems as traffic volumes growth, while sustaining physical elements of <br />the neighborhood’s rural heritage, such as older treed street sections. <br /> <br />Safety and traffic flows are obviously paramount concerns, but other values can be given significant <br />consideration. The City of Eugene is reasonably compelled to require full improvements at the time of <br />redevelopment or redevelopment, simply because an adjacent new housing project can be required to <br />make such upgrades as part of an overall development approval, or for traffic or safety considerations <br />Nonetheless, given that (at least with local streets) the issue of rural vs. suburban standards will often be <br />most strongly felt in older developed neighborhoods, there may be opportunities for the City to facilitate <br />the preservation of “heritage” streetscapes by balancing neighborhood needs with City-wide standards. <br /> <br />The surface street transportation systems in both neighborhoods include County and City jurisdiction <br />roads. County and City built roadways differ somewhat both because some County roads are older and <br />reflect the standards of the past, and because current standards are not necessarily consistent between <br />the two jurisdictions. More recently constructed roads exhibit common standards irrespective of <br />jurisdiction, as the City of Eugene has exercised functional transportation planning authority over River <br />Road and Santa Clara for nearly 20 years by intergovernmental agreement with Lane County. <br /> <br />The City and County have developed a series of other agreements for coordinating street maintenance <br />and improvements in River Road and Santa Clara, and in other areas within the Urban Growth Boundary <br />(UGB). Maintenance agreements specify individual streets as a City or County responsibility irrespective <br />of legal jurisdiction. The most current agreements identify and assign responsibility for a long list of <br />specific streets in the Santa Clara and River Road neighborhoods. The City and County also enter into <br />agreements to fund and construct upgrades to roads in “mixed” jurisdiction areas. <br /> <br />There are some distinctions that can be made between the two neighborhoods when it comes to streets, <br />primarily based on the pattern of older development and the opportunity for new or more recent <br />development. These are described below. For the purposes of discussing transition and heritage options <br />addressing streets and transportation, however, the two neighborhoods will be treated herein together. <br />With the caution that these are generalized descriptions with many exceptions, the pattern (and attendant <br />implications) of neighborhood street patterns, could be described as follows: <br /> <br />River Road <br />River Road, particularly south of Horn Street, is characterized by long east-west blocks. Between Horn <br />and Howard Street, there are many long north-south blocks and some long local streets that simply dead- <br />end. These street patterns would “date” the area as older than other parts of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />River Road north of Howard to Beltline Road exhibits a subdivision and local street pattern that looks <br />more typically contemporary and urban than areas south of Howard (e.g. blocks are shorter, there is more <br />regular pattern of connectivity between streets, etc.), although the pattern is still very grid-like. A <br />subdivision to the west of Bramblewood Park is an exception to this characterization, exhibiting a mix of <br />cul-de-sac and curvilinear streets that indicate a more recent subdivision. <br /> <br />There appears to be only a couple of tracts left in the River Road neighborhood that could accommodate <br />substantial new residential development, therefore most opportunities to upgrade streets through <br />35 <br />River Road/Santa Clara Transition/Heritage White Paper <br />DRAFT <br />11-24-05 <br /> <br />Service provider Review <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.