My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 5: PH on Ordinance Concerning Amendments to Public Facilities and Services Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2006
>
CC Agenda - 01/09/06 Mtg
>
Item 5: PH on Ordinance Concerning Amendments to Public Facilities and Services Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:52:21 PM
Creation date
1/6/2006 3:10:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
1/9/2006
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />ECC <br />UGENE ITY OUNCIL <br />AIS <br />GENDA TEM UMMARY <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Public Hearing: An Ordinance Concerning Remanded Provisions of Appendix B to <br />Ordinance Nos. 20325 and 20326; Amending Ordinance Nos. 20325 and 20326 by <br />Adoption of a New Appendix B; Repealing Section 5 of Each Ordinance; and Providing <br />an Immediate Effective Date <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting Date: January 9, 2006 Agenda Item Number: 5 <br />Department: Public Works Staff Contacts: Peter Ruffier, Jerry Lidz <br />www.eugene-or.gov Contact Telephone Number: 682-8606, 682-5880 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />ISSUE STATEMENT <br /> <br />In 2004, at the request of the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC), the City <br />Councils of Eugene and Springfield and the Lane County Board of Commissioners adopted the 2004 <br />MWMC Facilities Plan and associated amendments to the Metro Plan text and the text, tables and maps <br />of the Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP). The Home Builders Association of Lane County <br />appealed all of those actions to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA). LUBA upheld all of the City <br />Council/Board’s actions except for some of the project descriptions included in the PFSP, which LUBA <br />remanded for reconsideration. <br /> <br />The proposed ordinance (Attachment A) will fulfill the requirements of LUBA’s remand by <br />incorporating expanded project descriptions in the appropriate PFSP tables and maps, consistent with <br />information that is already in the record of the public hearing. The projects themselves are unchanged. <br /> <br />Due to the need to begin construction as soon as possible to assure compliance with pollution control <br />laws and permits, the proposed ordinance also eliminates the clause making the ordinance effective only <br />after acknowledgement by the Department of Land Conservation and Development. For the same <br />reason, staff will request that the council consider approving the proposed ordinance with an immediate <br />effective date at its January 23 meeting. The amendments proposed to address LUBA’s remand would <br />then become effective immediately upon adoption of identical ordinances by Lane County and the City <br />of Springfield. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />In May 2002, the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) imposed new and more stringent <br />discharge permit requirements on the regional wastewater treatment facilities. MWMC conducted a <br />comprehensive evaluation of the existing system to determine how to meet the new discharge permit <br />requirements. The result of that evaluation was the MWMC Facilities Plan. It determined that the <br />existing regional wastewater system does not have sufficient capacity to meet state and federal discharge <br />requirements and recommended $144--$160 million (in 2004 dollars) in capital improvement projects to <br />provide adequate treatment capability and capacity for growth through 2025. <br /> L:\CMO\2006 Council Agendas\M060109\S0601095.doc <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.