Laserfiche WebLink
4. WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS <br /> <br />flow rates. The studies recommended continued and additional funding to rehabilitate the <br />respective systems to correct structural deficiencies and reduce RDII contributions. <br /> <br />Comprehensive RDII reduction programs in both cities fulfill NPDES waste discharge <br />permit requirements. Both cities' programs include varying degrees of flow monitoring, TV <br />inspection, smoke testing, and manhole inspections as appropriate. Unfortunately, the <br />programs have not been as effective in controlling excessive peak flows as estimated in the <br />1978 SSES study. Limited success with RDII reduction programs has also been the case for <br />many other communities around the state and country. <br /> <br />The inability of RDII rehabilitation programs to achieve desired targets formed the impetus <br />for the September 2000 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP; CH2M HILL, 2001), <br />which evaluated and recommended individual technologies or combinations of <br />technologies to manage wet weather flows. The WWFMP estimated more up-to-date and <br />realistic rates of RDII reduction that could be expected as a result of collection system <br />rehabilitation projects. For the purposes of the WWFMP study, two groups of system <br />rehabilitation were evaluated: (1) rehabilitation of main lines and laterals within the public <br />right-of-way (lower lateral), and (2) rehabilitation of the same but including portions of the <br />laterals that are outside the public right-of-way (upper lateral). The two types of <br />rehabilitation are referred to as "public only" and "public and private." Public only includes <br />the entire collection system within the right-of-way limits, independent of ownership. <br /> <br />The cities of Eugene and Springfield have collected a large amount of data in the last 5 to <br />10 years to measure the effectiveness of their system rehabilitation programs. The data <br />comprise flow records taken before and after implementation of rehabilitation in specific <br />areas. These data were used for estimating the operational and economic benefits of further <br />system rehabilitation activity. All local data from both cities represented system <br />rehabilitation within the public rights-of-way. Neither city has performed comprehensive <br />system rehabilitation of the private laterals outside of rights-of-way; consequently, all local <br />data used in the WWFMP analyses represent the public-only condition. <br /> <br />CH2M HILL performed a three-phase analysis of the data. The first phase involved a <br />preliminary review of the raw data that resulted in a general assessment of system <br />rehabilitation benefit. The second involved a quantitative comparison of basin-specific data. <br />This examination reviewed pre- and post-rehabilitation RDII quantities relative to type and <br />amount of system rehabilitation per sub-basin. Both local and other agency data were <br />reviewed. The third phase identified performance measures to be used in later analyses of <br />wet weather flow management strategies. Along with performance measures, the economic <br />costs of system rehabilitation were reviewed. <br /> <br />Rehabilitation Practices and History <br />Most of the data used in estimating RDII reduction as a result of public-only system <br />rehabilitation are from City of Eugene projects and monitoring. The data are relatively <br />recent and considered appropriate as a basis for RDII reduction estimates. The City of <br />Springfield has also performed public-only system rehabilitation, but their data are not as <br />current and often represent unique system conditions. Post-rehabilitation monitoring was <br />not typically performed in Springfield. Therefore, the description of rehabilitation practices <br />in this section is based on work performed by the City of Eugene. It was assumed that RDII <br /> <br />MWMC_4.0_REV8. DOC 4-5 <br /> <br /> <br />