Laserfiche WebLink
4. WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS <br /> <br />The response of the sewer system to immediate and antecedent rainfall during the wet <br />weather events of the 1997-1998 monitoring period was analyzed as part of the WWFMP. As <br />a first gtep in analyzing the monitoring data, the diurnal base flow hydrograph for selected <br />storms was subtracted to obtain the RDII hydrograph. <br /> <br />For the WWFMP study, flow inputs were developed from regression equations, and were <br />modified to reflect the experience of MWMC operations personnel and the observations of <br />return ratio at monitor locations. The regression equations provided a method to generate <br />the RDII component of the flow input hydrograph for each monitoring location for any <br />storm of interest. Although the method is a good one, it can be deficient if the equation is <br />applied to storms that differ significantly in character (intensity, pattern, and volume) from <br />the storm for which the equation was created. <br /> <br />As part of the task of updating the MWMC MOUSE hydraulic model for 2003-2004, the <br />model was recalibrated using the latest flow monitor data from six permanent MGD <br />Technologies monitor installations (herein referred to as MGD monitors) within the <br />collection system and one at the WPCF. Changes to the collection system pipes and pump <br />stations were also incorporated into the updated model. The methodologies used to <br />generate model flow inputs were different than those used for the WWFMP, although the <br />relative distribution of flows within the collection system and the peak flow at the WPCF <br />were consistent with the WWFMP. <br /> <br />The MOUSE dry weather flow module was used to create the diurnal sanitary flow based <br />on population, and the MOUSE RDII module was used to generate system RDII flows from <br />rainfall. This change in methodology allowed all of the flow inputs to be generated within <br />the hydraulic model rather than as separate computations external to the MOUSE model. <br />More detailed information on the subject of the wastewater collection system hydraulic <br />modeling analysis is given in the March 2004 "MWMC Wastewater Facility Plan--Wet <br />Weather Peak Flow Analysis" technical memorandum (see appendix). <br /> <br />Assumptions for system rehabilitation identified under the WWFMP were incorporated in <br />the future conditions model rims (2025 and buildout). The WWFMP used a peak rainfall <br />dependent infiltration and inflow (RDII) rate of 2,000 gallons per additional future <br />developed acre per day for the 5-year storm event. The updated MOUSE model also uses <br />the 2,000 gallons per acre per day peak RDII rate for all future developed areas. This value <br />was derived as part of the WWFMP and was based on measured data in areas considered to <br />represent future system conditions. <br /> <br />System rehabilitation recommendations included in the WWFMP for existing and future <br />conditions were assumed to have been implemented for the 2025 peak flow estimates. These <br />rehabilitation projects were included in the plan as a result of the cost-effectiveness analysis <br />that identified projects to reduce peak flows in the collection system. <br /> <br />4.2 Wastewater Loading Characteristics <br /> <br />BOD and TSS concentrations at the WPCF are measured using 24-hour composite samples <br />collected and analyzed by plant personnel. <br /> <br />IVIWMC_4.0_REV8. DOC 4-7 <br /> <br /> <br />