My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A-MWMC Facilities Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-05/19/04WS
>
Item A-MWMC Facilities Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:11:10 PM
Creation date
5/12/2004 3:16:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
5/19/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
349
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MWMC FACILITIES PLAN <br /> <br />FIGURE ES-2 <br />Peak FI0w Capacity Deficit <br />/vlWMC Facilities Plan, Eugene-Springfield <br /> <br /> Current Capacity Additional Capacity Total Capacity Required <br /> Facility (mgd) Through 2025 (mgd) in 2025 {mgd) <br /> <br /> A B C=A+B <br />Influent Pumping 175 102 277 <br />Pretreatmen! 175 102 277 <br />Pdmary Treatment 90-110 50-70 160 <br />Secondary Treatment 100-110 50-60 160 <br />Disinfection 175 102 277 <br />Outfall 175 102 277 <br /> <br />Alternatives Evaluation <br /> <br />As shown in Figure ES-2, the treatment plant faces a significant peak flow capacity deficit. <br />The WPCF currently has no additional peak flow capacity, and an additional 102 mgd of <br />peak flow capacity is needed by 2025. The Facilities Plan analysis also concludes that in <br />order to meet NPDES permit requirements for ammonia, thermal load and total mass <br />removal, significant improvements to the treatment plant's unit processes are needed. <br /> <br />To solve these projected capacity shortfalls, all available options known to staff and the <br />consultants for resolving the regional treatment facilities capacity and performance <br />constraints were identified. The regulatory requirements and other planning criteria <br />discussed above were translated into a series of evaluation criteria. An evaluation matrix of <br />treatment facility needs and potential solutions was developed and the criteria were <br />applied, which resulted in a set of "preferred" and "acceptable" solutions. The solutions <br />were further evaluated based on compatibility with existing treatment plant processes and <br />on estimated costs, which resulted in the elimination of all but four systemwide alternative <br />solutions. (DEQ requires that a "no action" option be presented, so a total of five options are <br />summarized in the table below.) The final evaluation resulted in the alternatives <br />summarized in Table ES-l, which are the least costly to implement in addition to meeting <br />the stated planning requirements (with the exception of Alternative 1). <br /> <br />ES-4 MWMC_ EXECSUM_ REV4_2_. DOC <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.