Laserfiche WebLink
MWMC FACILITIES PLAN <br /> <br />system and WPCF wet weather treatment improvements. The WWFMP study determined <br />that collection system rehabilitation programs alone could not cost-effectively reduce WPCF <br />influent flows to the point that additional treatment capacity would not be required. If the <br />WPCF is not improved for wet weather, MWMC facilities would still experience capacity <br />issues and be at risk of sanitary sewer overflows. <br /> <br />Other, more dramatic actions could include enacting new regulations that would restrict <br />water use in the metropolitan area, or implementation of zoning changes and building <br />moratoriums throughout the MWMC service area. To protect public and environmental <br />health, these restrictions would need to be in place to constrain population and industrial <br />growth in the area, thus slowing the increase in wastewater flow to the treatment facilities. <br />While these programs would help to maintain the wastewater system and provide <br />additional environmental protection over the short-term, they would not eliminate the <br />eventual need to construct additional conveyance and treatment capacity for predicted long- <br />term increases in wastewater flows in the MWMC service area. <br /> <br />An additional option could include construction of new treatment facilities in an <br />undisclosed location in the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. However, the <br />construction of additional treatment capacity would require sizable funding, site <br />acquisition, design, permitting, and construction. These activities would require time to <br />complete and during this period MWMC facilities would be at maximum capacity and at <br />risk of overflow and violation of NPDES permit conditions. <br /> <br />9.3.3 Biological Resources <br />System Alternative ! would result in impacts to biological resources in the Willamette River. <br />Impacts from the No Project Alternative would be greater than impacts from System <br />Alternatives 5 and 4. <br /> <br />As noted above, System Alternative 1 would increase the potential for the discharge of <br />untreated wastewater into the Willamette River and other area waterways. This, in turn, <br />would impact water quality and would likely result in significant degradation of the <br />biological resources in the river downstream of the WPCF outfall. The discharge of <br />untreated wastewater would also likely result in increased potential to harm public health. <br /> <br />9.3.4 Air Quality, Odor, and Noise <br />System Alternative 1 would result in impacts to air quality, odor, and noise. Impacts from <br />System Alternative 1 would be greater than impacts from System Alternatives 5 and 4. <br /> <br />As the current MWMC facilities reach their capacity, increased flows during wet and dry <br />weather conditions will result in increased releases of fugitive odors. In general, the <br />proposed changes under System Alternatives 5 and 4 will improve odor control by <br />capturing more fugitive odors and using odor-reducing technologies. These changes in odor <br />control technology will greatly improve odor control in comparison to current and future <br />operating conditions under System Alternative 1. <br /> <br />With System Alternative 1, noise and air quality could also be impacted if the flow through <br />the facilities approaches full capacity. Increased facility loading could mean changes in <br /> <br /> 9-6 MWMC_9.0_REVl 4. DOC <br /> <br /> <br />